Nowhere Left to Turn? The Impact of Changes to the Social Fund (2024)

Some of the country's poorest families could be forced to turn to loan sharks, following changes to the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) Social Fund. That's the worrying conclusion from our report, Nowhere to Turn? Changes to Emergency Support, on local welfare assistance schemes.

Backed by the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, the report highlights the potential impact these changes to the Social Fund could have on some of the country's poorest families. It warns that many more families could be forced into a vicious spiral of debt.

As part of the government's drive towards greater localism, two main elements of the Social Fund - Community Care Grants and Crisis Loans - were abolished in April. Responsibility for delivering the replacement schemes was passed to councils in England.

Advertisem*nt

Crisis Loans provided support for immediate short-term needs, such as food, help to prevent the gas and electricity from being cut off and emergency travel to visit a sick relative. Community Care Grants were non-repayable grants to help children and adults leaving care settle into the community, such supporting care leavers to set up home.

Our report examined the support provided by new welfare assistance schemes. We found that only around a quarter (23%) of the schemes are providing loans. Without loans, the money is not repaid and re-invested in the schemes. This means that less support will be available for those in desperate need.

It also shows that the vast majority (81%) are replacing cash assistance - previously provided by the Social Fund - with 'in-kind' support, such as food bank vouchers and pre-pay store cards. These can often only be used in certain stores that may be difficult or expensive for families to get to.

Some councils are also imposing strict criteria for people to qualify for support. Examples include requiring claimants to show they cannot borrow from friends or family, and do not have access to consumer credit, such as credit and store cards. And some schemes are denying access to 16 and 17-year-olds preventing some young care leavers from getting support.

Advertisem*nt

By making it harder for those in need to get emergency support, the changes could force people to turn to loan sharks and sink deeper into debt. With over one million households being forced to take out payday loans every month as they struggle to meet the rising cost of living already, the demand for emergency support from vulnerable groups could significantly increase.

Crisis Loans were a lifeline for 35-year-old Sarah Davies from the South West, following the breakdown of her relationship with her ex-partner. Overnight, Sarah became a single mum with a two-year-old son to bring up. On the verge of being forced to a loan shark, Sarah heard about Crisis Loans and successfully applied. By having access to an interest-free emergency cash loan, and with support from The Children's Society, Sarah was able to put food on the table for her son Matthew and prevent her gas and electricity from being cut off. Changes to the Social Fund would make it harder for her to get that vital support now.

We know that councils face an unprecedented squeeze on budgets, with money allocated for the welfare assistance schemes cut by nearly 50%. And many local authorities have made real efforts to introduce effective replacement schemes. But to prevent children and their families from becoming the casualties of changes to the Social Fund, a number of important steps must be taken.

First, with government support, local authorities should make it a priority to find ways of providing interest free loans through their welfare assistance schemes. For example, the government could administer a loan scheme which allows local authorities to recover the money directly through deductions from benefits.

Fair and consistent eligibility criteria must also be established to avoid a postcode lottery. Support must always be provided based on need, not where you live.

Advertisem*nt

Finally, The Children's Society is calling for no further cuts in funding for welfare assistance schemes. Adequate resources must be provided to support those most in need.

The Social Fund was the last line of defence for many vulnerable families. Some of the poorest in society will pay a heavy price if we fail to prevent those in crisis from being pushed further to the margins.

The Children's Society has created an interactive map for people to find out what replacement schemes are being provided by their local authority. Visit their website for more info: childrenssociety.org.uk/local-assistance

Related

social fundwelfare assistanceThe Children's Societyuk politicscrisis loans
Nowhere Left to Turn? The Impact of Changes to the Social Fund (2024)

FAQs

How much money did the government take out of the Social Security fund? ›

The Government Has Borrowed $1.7 Trillion From The Social Security Trust Fund. The government has borrowed the total value of the Trust Fund to pay for other government spending.

Why is the United States Social Security fund so depleted? ›

Current taxes and any accumulated surplus fund everyone's benefits. Payroll tax contributions are not reserved for future payouts to the particular taxpayer. Fewer workers are left to contribute toward the benefits of each retiree as Baby Boomers retire and the U.S. population ages.

How do I get the $16728 Social Security bonus? ›

There's really no “bonus” that retirees can collect. The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a specific formula based on your lifetime earnings to determine your benefit amount.

What is generally happening with the funding of Social Security that is problematic? ›

But the program faces a long-run financing shortfall. By 2034, the trust funds which have been supplementing dedicated Social Security payroll tax revenues in recent years are projected to be depleted. At that time, incoming tax revenues will be sufficient to pay only about 80% of scheduled benefits.

How many presidents took money out of the Social Security fund? ›

Since 1983, every US President has borrowed from Social Security to pay for government expenditures. However, there is no evidence that any of the presidents has stolen a dime from Social Security.

Has the US government borrowed money from the Social Security fund? ›

Yes, the federal government borrows Social Security funds, but it is required to pay the money back with interest.

What will replace Social Security? ›

In the proposals presented to the Commission, the use of retirement bonds--and annuities based on bond accumulations- would also replace the entire benefit structure of Social Security for the future.

How much longer will Social Security last? ›

Will Social Security still be around when I retire? Yes. The Social Security taxes you now pay go into the Social Security Trust Funds and are used to pay benefits to current beneficiaries. The Social Security Board of Trustees now estimates that based on current law, in 2041, the Trust Funds will be depleted.

What is the biggest problem with Social Security? ›

Its trust funds are running out

Social Security relies primarily on payroll taxes to fund benefits. Today's workers pay into the program through taxes, and that money is then paid out to current beneficiaries. In recent years, though, the program's income hasn't been enough to fully cover its expenses.

Can you get $3,000 a month in Social Security? ›

For example, if you get $36,000 a year ($3,000 a month) from Social Security and have no other income, your combined income is $36,000 divided by 2, or $18,000. None of your benefits are taxable if your income is below $25,000 for a single filer or $32,000 for joint filers.

What is the 10 year rule for Social Security? ›

For starters, you must have been married for 10 or more years and you can't be remarried. To receive ex-spouse benefits you have to be at least 62 years old and your ex-spouse has to be old enough to receive Social Security.

When a husband dies, does his wife get his Social Security? ›

Social Security survivors benefits are paid to widows, widowers, and dependents of eligible workers. This benefit is particularly important for young families with children.

Did Congress take money from Social Security? ›

The idea of Congress stealing from Social Security and not paying interest is a complete myth. There are, however, tangible reasons for Social Security's struggles, many of which can be tied to long-running demographic shifts.

Which presidents borrowed from the Social Security fund? ›

Every president since Kennedy has been accused of stealing money from Social Security. Some even claim that Ford and Carter stole money from the system, and their budgets actually subsidized the program. There isn't a shred of evidence to suggest that any program money has been misused.

What are the disadvantages of Social Security? ›

The most common disadvantages include:
  • Reduced benefits – If you wait until you turn 65 years old, you can receive the full available benefits each month. ...
  • Employment penalties – You might choose to retire early but decide to re-enter the workforce occasionally or part-time.

When did the US government take money from Social Security? ›

The taxation of Social Security began in 1984 following passage of a set of Amendments in 1983, which were signed into law by President Reagan in April 1983. These amendments passed the Congress in 1983 on an overwhelmingly bi-partisan vote.

Where did all the Social Security funds go? ›

By law, the funds are invested in special-issue Treasury securities that earn interest. In effect, the funds are loaned to the Treasury, which borrows the money just as it borrows money when it sells Treasury securities to the public.

Does Social Security come out of the federal budget? ›

Today, Social Security is the largest program in the federal budget and typically makes up almost one-fifth of total federal spending.

How much did the government spend on Social Security in 2018? ›

Mandatory spending by the federal government totaled $2.5 trillion in 2018, of which $1.7 trillion was for Social Security and Medicare.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Merrill Bechtelar CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6083

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Merrill Bechtelar CPA

Birthday: 1996-05-19

Address: Apt. 114 873 White Lodge, Libbyfurt, CA 93006

Phone: +5983010455207

Job: Legacy Representative

Hobby: Blacksmithing, Urban exploration, Sudoku, Slacklining, Creative writing, Community, Letterboxing

Introduction: My name is Merrill Bechtelar CPA, I am a clean, agreeable, glorious, magnificent, witty, enchanting, comfortable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.