Banks still investing heavily in fossil fuels despite net zero pledges – study (2024)

Banks and finance institutions that have signed up to net zero pledges are still investing heavily in fossil fuels, research has shown, leading to accusations they are acting as “climate arsonists”.

The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) initiative was launched by the former Bank of England governor Mark Carney, as one of the main UK achievements in hosting the Cop26 UN climate summit at Glasgow in 2021.

The UK boasted at Cop26 that 450 organisations in 45 countries with assets of more than $130tn had signed up to GFANZ, to align their investments with the goal of limiting global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.

But its members have poured hundreds of billions into fossil fuels since then, according to data compiled by the pressure group Reclaim Finance.

GFANZ is made up of numerous smaller groupings that require members to reduce their exposure to fossil fuels. But at least 56 of the biggest banks in the net-zero banking alliance grouping (NZBA) have provided $270bn to 102 fossil fuel companies for their expansion, through 134 loans and 215 underwriting arrangements, according to Reclaim Finance.

Paddy McCully, senior analyst at Reclaim Finance, said: “GFANZ members are acting as climate arsonists. They’ve pledged to achieve net zero but are continuing to pour hundreds of billions of dollars into fossil fuel developers. GFANZ and its member alliances will only be credible once they up their game and insist that their members help bring a rapid end to the era of coal, oil and fossil gas expansion.

GFANZ companies are also failing to divest from fossil fuels. In the net zero asset managers grouping (NZAM), another part of GFANZ, at least $847bn in assets in more than 200 fossil fuel companies were held by the 58 largest members, as of last September, according to the report published on Tuesday.

The report also found that few of the GFANZ members had put in place watertight investment polices that would stop them financing new fossil fuel projects, even though all are supposed to be shifting their portfolios to be in line with the 1.5C goal, confirmed at Cop26.

Lucie Pinson, executive director and founder of Reclaim Finance, accused the alliance of greenwashing. “It is business as usual for most banks and investors [involved in GFANZ], who continue to support fossil fuel developers without any restrictions, despite their high-profile commitments to carbon neutrality,” she said. “Their greenwashing is all the more damaging as it casts doubt on the sincerity of all net zero commitments, and undermines the efforts of those who are truly acting for the climate.”

One of the biggest banks involved in GFANZ is HSBC, which announced restrictions on oil and gas financing last month. But it has approved 58 transactions worth $12bn in capital to fossil fuel developers, since joining a GFANZ grouping in April 2021, according to the Reclaim Finance report.

A spokesperson for HSBC told the Guardian: “HSBC’s aim is to reduce emissions in line with a 1.5C pathway, promote energy security, and ensure energy affordability and access, as part of our commitment to a net zero future. In line with our 1.5C-aligned 2030 financed emissions targets and updated energy policy we will no longer provide new finance or advisory for the specific purposes of new oil and gas fields or related infrastructure, or for the most carbon-intensive oil assets. To accelerate an orderly transition to net zero, we continue to support clients who are playing an active role in the energy transition, including through regular engagement on their transition plans.”

The spokesperson added that fossil fuels were still likely to be necessary for a transition period. “The International Energy Agency’s seminal Net Zero 2050 report outlines that an orderly transition requires continued financing and investment in existing oil and gas fields to maintain the necessary output and security of supply – with 2020 financing levels maintained through 2030 and declining to half thereafter,” they said.

skip past newsletter promotion

after newsletter promotion

However, Reclaim Finance pointed out that the IEA has also made clear that no new fossil fuel development can take place if the world is to remain within the limit of 1.5C of heating, above pre-industrial levels. It has identified the fossil fuel developers in the report as those engaged in expansion of their assets, such as new drilling and new mining.

LGIM is the biggest UK company in the NZAM initiative, yet in September it held at least $13bn of assets in fossil fuel developers, the report found.

A spokesperson for LGIM told the Guardian: “LGIM is one of the founder members of the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative established as part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) and as part of our commitment to the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative and in partnership with and on behalf of our clients, LGIM has set its own interim net zero AUM [assets under management] target of 70% by 2030, and continues to make progress towards this climate transition. Financing the transition is vitally important and certain fossil fuels will need to be part of the transition to renewable alternatives. By divesting from entire sectors like oil and gas, we won’t achieve any real world outcome and investors lose their ability to exert a positive influence via active engagement.”

A spokeswoman for GFANZ said: “This report focuses on an important aspect of the energy transition. It’s clear a lot of work needs to be done to ensure the world is deploying capital consistent with a 1.5C pathway, which is exactly why GFANZ was created. Based on research GFANZ commissioned last year, we know that investment in renewables needs to be four times the levels going into fossil fuels by 2030 to restrict climate change consistent with the aims of the Paris agreement.”

She added: “GFANZ members will detail how they are financing the transition of the energy sector when they publish their interim targets and transition plans. This will allow government, investors and civil society organisations to track progress. We call on financial institutions not in GFANZ to join the alliances that comprise GFANZ to provide transparency and become part of the solution.”

Banks still investing heavily in fossil fuels despite net zero pledges – study (2024)

FAQs

Banks still investing heavily in fossil fuels despite net zero pledges – study? ›

“This year's report is clear - banks are gambling our future on risky investments that fuel the climate crisis. In 2023 alone, banks invested more than $700 billion in fossil fuels despite having net-zero commitments. Let's keep these big banks accountable, not just counting on fossil fuels.

What Bank does not invest in fossil fuels? ›

Triodos Bank

Sectors Triodos invests in include renewable energy, sustainable farming, education, charities and social housing. You won't find it investing in fossil fuels or other destructive industries such as fast fashion, weapons, tobacco or deforestation.

What Bank invests the most in fossil fuels? ›

According to the annual Banking on Climate Chaos report, the Royal Bank of Canada put $42 billion US toward fossil fuel projects in 2022. That makes it the world's largest investor in fossil fuels, and four other Canadian banks made the list as well.

What does net zero mean for banks? ›

What is net zero banking? An organization achieves net zero when it balances the carbon that it emits into and removes from the atmosphere.

Does Bank of America support fossil fuels? ›

According to the Banking on Climate Chaos report, Bank of America has been the world's fourth largest funder of fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement, providing over $279 billion to fossil fuels between 2016-2022, including to some of the riskiest and most destructive sectors, like oil drilling in the Amazon and ...

Are banks still investing in fossil fuels? ›

In 2023, banks financed $705 billion in fossil fuel financing, with $347 billion alone going to top fossil fuel expanders. JPMorgan Chase was the #1 fossil fuel financier in the world last year, committing $40.8 billion dollars to fossil fuel companies in 2023. Chase is also #1 for fossil fuel expansion in 2023.

What is the least ethical bank? ›

Many of us do and an easy way to do that is to keep your money OUT of the least ethical banks around. In the US, the four least ethical banks are easy to spot. It's Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citi Bank.

Who is the biggest investor in fossil fuels? ›

At the top of that list is JPMorgan Chase, the largest funder of fossil fuels cumulatively since the Paris Agreement on climate change was signed in 2016, according to the report. Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America are also among the top five fossil financiers since 2016, the report found.

Who is the biggest supplier of fossil fuels? ›

"The United States Is Now the Largest Global Crude Oil Producer." U.S. Energy Information Administration. "Oil and Petroleum Products Explained." World Bank.

Who is the biggest user of fossil fuels in the US? ›

The transportation sector is by far the largest consumer of petroleum products in the U.S. Unlike coal, petroleum consumption has remained high, despite growing concerns over its impact on the climate.

Why is net zero a problem? ›

Net-zero pledges can potentially worsen climate inequities. For example, wealthy countries, which include some of the largest historical polluters, are able to fund offset projects outside their borders while continuing to pollute at home.

Who benefits from net zero? ›

Becoming a net zero business may be attractive for investors and shareholders looking for companies with a long-term sustainable strategy. Investors may be attracted to smaller businesses that are less reliant on fossil fuels, as business operations are less likely to be disrupted in the event of supply problems.

How can banks reduce their carbon footprint? ›

Renewable energy: Banks can reduce their carbon emissions by investing in renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power. Renewable energy can help to lower the bank's carbon footprint by reducing the need for fossil fuels.

What banks do not use ESG? ›

The American banks – Citi, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo – are listed as having left the group of institutions that have signed the principles. The news was condemned by climate groups as “shocking” and “cowardly”.

Which is the greenest bank? ›

The top 10 most sustainable banks in the world in 2023
  • #8 Rabobank (Netherlands) ...
  • #7 BNP Paribas (France) ...
  • #6 Crédit Agricole (France) ...
  • #5 DBS Bank (Singapore) ...
  • #4 Swedbank (Sweden) ...
  • #3 Standard Chartered (UK) ...
  • #2 ING Bank (Netherlands) ...
  • #1 KfW (Germany)
Feb 20, 2023

Where does US get fossil fuels from? ›

How much petroleum does the United States import and export?
Import sourcesGross importsNet imports
Canada4.42 (52%)3.62
Mexico0.91 (11%)-0.26
Saudi Arabia0.44 (5%)0.44
Iraq0.32 (4%)0.32
6 more rows
Mar 29, 2024

What is the greenest bank? ›

The top 10 most sustainable banks in the world in 2023
  • #8 Rabobank (Netherlands) ...
  • #7 BNP Paribas (France) ...
  • #6 Crédit Agricole (France) ...
  • #5 DBS Bank (Singapore) ...
  • #4 Swedbank (Sweden) ...
  • #3 Standard Chartered (UK) ...
  • #2 ING Bank (Netherlands) ...
  • #1 KfW (Germany)
Feb 20, 2023

What's the most ethical bank? ›

Here are our top nine ethical banks and building societies in 2024:
  • Triodos Bank.
  • Charity Bank.
  • Ecology Building Society.
  • The Co-operative Bank.
  • Coventry Building Society.
  • Nationwide Building Society.
  • Starling Bank.
  • Gatehouse Bank.
Apr 3, 2024

Does Capital One bank support fossil fuels? ›

Capital One is one of world's biggest funders of fossil fuels. At the end of 2023, it had $2.7BN of loans to the oil & gas industry. While you've been saving money for a home or a weekend get-away, your bank has likely been using your savings to lend to some very questionable fossil fuel friends.

Which banks are bad for the environment? ›

Here we round up the six worst offenders – and where to switch your money so it ISN'T funding climate change.
  • JP Morgan Chase. JP Morgan Chase is an American multinational banking corporation with a growing presence in the UK. ...
  • Barclays. ...
  • HSBC (including First Direct) ...
  • Santander. ...
  • Natwest/ Royal Bank of Scotland. ...
  • Lloyds Bank.
Nov 27, 2023

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mr. See Jast

Last Updated:

Views: 5958

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mr. See Jast

Birthday: 1999-07-30

Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

Phone: +5023589614038

Job: Chief Executive

Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.