Abstract
We examine the informativeness of quarterly disclosed portfolio holdings across four institutional investor types: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and private banking firms. Overweight positions outperform underweight positions only for hedge funds. By decomposing holdings and stock returns, we find that hedge funds are superior to other institutional investors both at picking industries and stocks and that they are better at forecasting long-term as well as short-term returns. Furthermore, our results show that hedge funds, mutual funds and pension funds are able to successfully time the market. The outperformance of hedge funds is not explained by a liquidity premium.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 449-480 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Accounting and Finance |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | S1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2019 |
Keywords
- Holdings informativeness
- Institutional investors
- Market timing
- Portfolio holdings
- Stock picking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which institutional investor types are the most informed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Chen, Z., Forsberg, D., & Gallagher, D. R. (2019). Which institutional investor types are the most informed? Accounting and Finance, 59(S1), 449-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12378
Chen, Zhe ; Forsberg, David ; Gallagher, David R. / Which institutional investor types are the most informed?. In: Accounting and Finance. 2019 ; Vol. 59, No. S1. pp. 449-480.
@article{9ab670246619418399a55b735a8c910a,
title = "Which institutional investor types are the most informed?",
abstract = "We examine the informativeness of quarterly disclosed portfolio holdings across four institutional investor types: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and private banking firms. Overweight positions outperform underweight positions only for hedge funds. By decomposing holdings and stock returns, we find that hedge funds are superior to other institutional investors both at picking industries and stocks and that they are better at forecasting long-term as well as short-term returns. Furthermore, our results show that hedge funds, mutual funds and pension funds are able to successfully time the market. The outperformance of hedge funds is not explained by a liquidity premium.",
keywords = "Holdings informativeness, Institutional investors, Market timing, Portfolio holdings, Stock picking",
author = "Zhe Chen and David Forsberg and Gallagher, {David R.}",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acfi.12378",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "449--480",
journal = "Accounting and Finance",
issn = "0810-5391",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "S1",
}
Chen, Z, Forsberg, D & Gallagher, DR 2019, 'Which institutional investor types are the most informed?', Accounting and Finance, vol. 59, no. S1, pp. 449-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12378
Which institutional investor types are the most informed? / Chen, Zhe; Forsberg, David; Gallagher, David R.
In: Accounting and Finance, Vol. 59, No. S1, 01.04.2019, p. 449-480.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Which institutional investor types are the most informed?
AU - Chen, Zhe
AU - Forsberg, David
AU - Gallagher, David R.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - We examine the informativeness of quarterly disclosed portfolio holdings across four institutional investor types: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and private banking firms. Overweight positions outperform underweight positions only for hedge funds. By decomposing holdings and stock returns, we find that hedge funds are superior to other institutional investors both at picking industries and stocks and that they are better at forecasting long-term as well as short-term returns. Furthermore, our results show that hedge funds, mutual funds and pension funds are able to successfully time the market. The outperformance of hedge funds is not explained by a liquidity premium.
AB - We examine the informativeness of quarterly disclosed portfolio holdings across four institutional investor types: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds and private banking firms. Overweight positions outperform underweight positions only for hedge funds. By decomposing holdings and stock returns, we find that hedge funds are superior to other institutional investors both at picking industries and stocks and that they are better at forecasting long-term as well as short-term returns. Furthermore, our results show that hedge funds, mutual funds and pension funds are able to successfully time the market. The outperformance of hedge funds is not explained by a liquidity premium.
KW - Holdings informativeness
KW - Institutional investors
KW - Market timing
KW - Portfolio holdings
KW - Stock picking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064037366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acfi.12378
DO - 10.1111/acfi.12378
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064037366
SN - 0810-5391
VL - 59
SP - 449
EP - 480
JO - Accounting and Finance
JF - Accounting and Finance
IS - S1
ER -
Chen Z, Forsberg D, Gallagher DR. Which institutional investor types are the most informed? Accounting and Finance. 2019 Apr 1;59(S1):449-480. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12378