Understanding Reinsurance: Structure of Reinsurance- Proportional and Non Proportional (2024)

Now that we know what reinsurance is all about and the two categories underwhich it falls, i.e Treaty Reinsurance and Facultative Reinsurance. Lets take a look at how this two categories are structured.

Part 1: Proportional Reinsurance.

Depending on how the Risks, Premiums and losses are shared between the Cedant and the Reinsurer, Treaty/ Facultative Reinsurance can either be of proportional or non- proportional nature. i.e a Proportional Treaty Reinsurance or a Non Proportional Facultative Reinsurance.

What do we mean when we say "of a proportional or non- proportional nature"?

With a Proportional Form of Reinsurance Cover, the Insurer and the Reinsurer share the sums insured (Liabilities) in a clearly defined proportion. This proportion (for Qouta Share Treaties) is usually stated in the schedule of the treaty agreement. In addition to sharing the sums insured, the premiums and claims are equally shared in the same proportion. To give you a better understanding of this, consider a basic proportional arrangement between Insurer A and Reinsurer Z. Insurer A enters into a treaty agreement with reinsurer Z to buy Reinsurance protection for 40% of the risks it underwrities under its fire business. under the proportional arrangment, Reinsurer Z will bear 40% of the liabilities (sums insured) for every fire risk. In addition to this, 40% of the premium will be transfered to Z as the cost for the protection. When a loss arises, Z will pay A 40% of the losses incurred. You will notice that the proportion is stated as 40% and applies across the liabilities, premiums and Losses.

There are three main forms of proportional reinsurance i.e Quota Share, Surplus and Facultative-Obligatory (Fac-Oblig).

Quota Share.(Q.S) - With this form, the Cedant is obligated to cede and the Reinsurer obligated to accept a fixed proportion (expressed as a percentage) of each and every risk written by the cedant for example 40% : 60% . This means the cedant retains 40% and cededs 60% of each and every risk written by it. Consider for example an apartment building with a sum insured of 1,000,000.00: the cedant will retain 400,000(40%*1,000,000.00) and cede 600,000.00 (60%*1,000,000) to the reinsurer. Under the Q.S arrangment,there is a fixed upper limit within which the arrangment holds. any amount above this limit will be reinsured with any other form of reinsurance or facultatively. what does this mean? if in the above example the fixed upper limit was 10,000,000.00, then risks with sums insured of upto 10,000,000 will be absorbed by the qouta share arrangment while risks with sums insured exceeding 10,000,000.00 the amount of risk in excess of the 10,000,000.00 can be reinsured with an alternative arrangment e.g surplus or facultative.

Detailed Example A. An apartment Block with a sum insured: 1,000,000, Premium: 2,000.00, Loss Amount, 500,000.00

Risks Sharing: Insruer A retains 40% = 40%*1,000,000.00 = 400,000.00 and Cedes to the Qouta Share Treaty 60% (Portion beared by the Reinsurer) = 60%*1,000,000.00 = 600,000.00

Premium Sharing: Insurer A: 40% *2,000.00= 800.00 and Reinsurer Z: 60%*2,000.00= 1,200.00

Loss Sharing: Insurer A: 40% *500,000.00= 200,000.00 and Reinsure Z: 60%*500,000.00= 300,000.00

Lets now consider an example in which the Q.S arrangment has an upper limit.

Detailed Example B. An apartment building with a sum insured: 12,000,000.00, Premium of 240,000.00, Loss Amount of 1,000,000.00 and Quota Share treaty limit of 10,000,000.00.

You will notice in this example that the Sum Insured of the apartment building exceeds the Qouta Share treaty limit by 2,000,000.00. This means that the first 10,000,000.00 of the 12,000,000.00 ( 83.3%) will absorbed by Insurer A's Qouta Share Treaty, while the extra 2,000,000.00 (16.7%) will be Reinsured with an alternative arrangment lets say facultative reinsurance. In case you are wondering how the percentages came about; (10,000,000/12,000,000.00*100= 83.3%) and ( 2,000,000.00/12,000,000.00*100= 16.7%). Under the Qouta Share treaty therefore, Insurer A Retains 40% of 83.3%= 33.32%, and Cedes 60% of 83.3% =49.98% to Reinsurer Z.

Of the entire sum of 12,000,000.00, the proportions born by the cedant, reinsurer and the facultative reinsurer will be 33.32% for Insurer A , 49.98% fore Reinsurer Z and and 16.7% for faculative reinsurer. This same proportions will apply across premiums and losses.

Risk Sharing: Insurer A retains 33.2%= 33.2%*12,000,000.00=3,984,000.00, Cedes to Reinsurer Z 49.98% = 49.98%*12,000,000.00= 5,997,600.00, Facultative takes 16.7% = 16.7%*12,000,000.00= 2,004,000.00

Premium Sharing: Insurer A 33.32%* 240,000.00= 79,968.00, Reinsure Z: 49.98%*240,000.00=119,952.00 and Facultative 16.7%*240,000.00=40,080.00

Loss Sharing: Insurer A:33.32%*1,000,000.00=333,200.00 Reinsurer Z: 499,800.00 Facultative: 16.7%*1,000,000.00= 167,000.00

One of the main benefits of a quota share arrangment lies in its simplicity. It is simple to operate and admninister and is often recomeneded for a new company starting bussines or an already existing company begining a new a class of bussines for which it has no prior experiance or statistical data.

The downside however to this kind of treaty is that the cedant has no control over the risks he choses to retain. Of every risk, good or bad, small or large, the cedant must share with the Reinsurer as per the proportions set out in the agreement (Treaty).

Surplus Reinsurance: Under this form of reinsurance, the ceding company agrees to cede and the reinsurer agrees to accept any amount of risk in excess of the ceding company's retention. In otherwords, the Reinsurer only offers protection for the excess amount of any one risk that exceeds what the ceding company can retain on its net account.

If for example, a ceding compay retains only 100 of any one risk for its net acccount. for a Building of 400.00, the surplus treaty will offer protection for the extra 300 while the ceding company retains 100.00

The Size/Capacity of a surplus treaty is determined as a multiple of the ceding company's retention and is normally expressed in terms of "lines". For a company with a gross retention of 100.00, a 10 line surplus treaty will have a capacity of 1000 (10*100). The total capacity of the treaty will therefore by the retention + surplus capacity = 100+ 1000= 1100. *Remember: one line= cedants retention . In cases where the qouta share and surplus forms are combined under one treaty, the gross retention constitutes the qouta share treaty. This form of treaty is used *mainly for property lines of business and may be arrangend in multiples i.e First Surplus Treaty, Second Surplus Treaty and so on......

For a risk that exeeds the capacity of the surplus treaty, the excess amount is reinsured facultatively.

To better understand how the approtinment of risks is done in a surplus treaty, consider the following example.

Insurer A has a retention of 1,000,000.00,and 6 Line surplus treaty (6*1,000,000.00= 6,000,000.00). The Total Treaty capacity of A= 1,000,000.00+6,000,000.00= 7,000,000.00.

Scenario 1: Company X places a fire business with A with the following details. Sum Insured: 5,000,000.00, Premium : 800,000.00 and surffers a loss of 4,000,000.00

The Proportion of Risk retained by A will be 1,000,000/5,000,000.00 =20%. and Proportion reinsured under the surplus treaty will be the amount in excess of the 1,000,000 i.e 4,000,000/5,000,000.00= 80.0%

The Premum and losses will then be apportioned based on the same proportions in which the sum insured has been aportioned: Premium Sharing. Retained -20% *800,00.00=160,000.00, Surplus Treaty- 80%*800,000.00=640,000.00 Losses Sharing: Retained 20%*4,000,000.00=800,000.00, Surplus: 80%*4,000,000.00=3,200,000.00

Scenario 2: Company X places a fire business with A with the following details. Sum Insured: 10,000,000.00, Premium : 1,000,000.00 and surffers a loss of 3,000,000.00

you will notice with this example that, the sum insured exceeds the treaty capacity of 7,000,000.00. so the extra 3,000,000.00 will be reinsured facultively while the initial 1,000,000.00 and 6,000,000.00 will be retained and reinsured under the surplus treaty respectively.

The apportionament of risk will be as thus: Retained- 1,000,000/10,000,000.00= 10%, Surplus Treaty- 6,000,000.00/10,000,000.00= 60.0% and Facultative = 3,000,000.00/10,000,000.00= 30.0%

The proportions obtained above will then be used to allocate the Premiums and Losses as detailed below.

Premium: Retained- 10%*1,000,000.00=100,000.00, Surplus- 60.0%*1,000,000.00= 600,000.00 and Facultative-30.0%*1,000,000.00=300,000.00

Losses: Retained- 10%*3,000,000.00= 300,000.00 Surplus: 60.0%* 3,000,000.00= 1,800,000.00 and Facultative- 30.0%*3,000,000.00= 900,000.00

It is important to note that only risks that exceed the company's retentions are reinsured under the surplus. If the surplus capacity is exhasusted, then facultative arrangment can be sought. A company not wishing to rely on facultative reinsurance may decide to increase the capacity of its surplus treaty by increasing the number of lines or obtain an additional surplus treaty. i.e A second surplus treaty or third surplus treaty

Unlike the Quota Share, with a surplus treaty, the adminstration costs are relatively high and more expertise and experiance is needed to manage. Also there is the possibilty of an imbalance in the portfolio reinsured where the Cedant retains all the good risks and transfers the less desirable risks to the surplus treaty.

Facultative - Obligatory (Fac-Oblig): Normally used for placing individual risks, This Form is a Union between the principles of facultative and treaty methods with the distinguishing feature being that it is facultative for the cedant and obligatory for the reinsurer. The cedant may cede a risk or not but if he does cede, the reinsurer must accept the risk ceded.

A high degree of trust should exist between the insurer and reinsurer so that the reinsurer can receive a resonable spread of risks from the cedant. This form of reinsurance is less favourable with most reinsruers since the onus is on the reinsruer to accpet all risks that the cedant decides to include leaving them exposed to the cedant selecting the most hazardous risks from its portfolio.

With the Fac-Oblig, the cedant does not have to worry about having to seek support facultative support for risks that exceed his treaty capacity as he is already assured of support from the reinsurer.

Next Article: Understanding Reinsurance: Part 2 - Non Proportional Reinsurance (Excess of Loss).

Understanding Reinsurance: Structure of Reinsurance- Proportional and Non Proportional (2024)

FAQs

What is the difference between proportional and non-proportional treaty reinsurance? ›

Proportional vs non-proportional treaties

Proportional treaties share the entire burden of written risks between the insurer and the reinsurer. Consequently, they are used to cover risks that occur frequently. On the other hand, non-proportional treaties are used to cover events of extreme intensity.

What is the main objective of non-proportional reinsurance? ›

Non-proportional reinsurance serves as protection against large losses or catastrophic events. Common types of non-proportional reinsurance include catastrophe, excess of loss, and aggregate excess.

What are the different types of reinsurance structures? ›

Reinsurance allows insurers to remain solvent by recovering all or part of a payout. Companies that seek reinsurance are called ceding companies. Types of reinsurance include facultative, proportional, and non-proportional.

What is proportional and non-proportional reinsurance investopedia? ›

Proportional reinsurance is an arrangement where the insurer and reinsurer share an agreed percentage of both premiums and losses. Non-proportional reinsurance is a system by which the reinsurer pays only when losses exceed an agreed-upon amount.

What is the difference between proportional and non-proportional? ›

The graph of a proportional relationship passes through the origin, and its equation is in the form y = m x + b , where m is the slope and b, the y-intercept is equal to zero. Non-proportional relationships have varied ratios between output and input values; its line graph does not pass through the origin.

How is non-proportional reinsurance priced? ›

Prices for non-proportional reinsurance are agreed upon between cedants and reinsurers. This can be done through direct negotiations or through (reinsurance) brokers.

What are the 4 most important reasons for reinsurance? ›

Several common reasons for reinsurance include: 1) expanding the insurance company's capacity; 2) stabilizing underwriting results; 3) financing; 4) providing catastrophe protection; 5) withdrawing from a line or class of business; 6) spreading risk; and 7) acquiring expertise.

Is excess of loss a non-proportional reinsurance? ›

Excess of loss reinsurance is a form of non-proportional reinsurance. Non-proportional reinsurance is based on loss retention. With non-proportional reinsurance, the ceding company agrees to accept all losses up to a predetermined level.

What are the types of non-proportional insurance? ›

Non-proportional
  • Under non-proportional reinsurance the reinsurer only pays out if the total claim(s) suffered by the insurer exceed a stated amount, which is called the "retention" or "priority". ...
  • The main forms of non-proportional reinsurance are excess of loss and stop loss.

What are the two basic methods of reinsurance? ›

The different methods of reinsurance

Three reinsurance methods are usual: Treaty Reinsurance, Facultative Reinsurance and a hybrid mode with elements from the Treaty and the Facultative. This is the most common cession method within the reinsurance market.

How is reinsurance structured? ›

What is Structured Reinsurance? When used to support this strategy structured reinsurance consists of a multi-year, multi-line programme negotiated on pre-agreed terms, providing each loss and potentially annual aggregate protection. There is a significant element of risk-sharing which rewards good claims experience.

What is reinsurance for dummies? ›

Reinsurance occurs when multiple insurance companies share risk by purchasing insurance policies from other insurers to limit their own total loss in case of disaster. By spreading risk, an insurance company takes on clients whose coverage would be too great of a burden for the single insurance company to handle alone.

What is proportional and non-proportional reinsurance? ›

Treaty reinsurances can be in the form of either proportional or nonproportional treaty reinsurance. In simple terms, the proportional treaties are intended to provide capacity while the non-proportional are designed to protect the risks retained by the reinsured entity.

What is the concept of proportional? ›

The term proportionality describes any relationship that is always in the same ratio. The number of apples in a crop, for example, is proportional to the number of trees in the orchard, the ratio of proportionality being the average number of apples per tree.

What is the proportional rule in insurance? ›

The proportional rule is the formula that the insurer can apply to calculate the compensation to the beneficiary of an Insurance policy in the event of a partial loss when the sum insured is less than the actual value of the insured object; that is, when underinsurance occurs.

What is the difference between FAC and treaty reinsurance? ›

While they are both forms of reinsurance, facultative considers each policy individually and generally indicates a shorter term relationship. Treaty, on the other hand, considers multiple policies of a specific class of insurance issued by an insurance company and indicates the companies will work together longer term.

What is the difference between quota share and proportional reinsurance? ›

A quota share arrangement is a proportional reinsurance contract where the insurer and the reinsurer split a fixed percentage of the premiums and losses of a portfolio of policies. For example, if the insurer cedes 40% of its business to the reinsurer, it will also receive 40% of the premiums and pay 40% of the losses.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kelle Weber

Last Updated:

Views: 5717

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kelle Weber

Birthday: 2000-08-05

Address: 6796 Juan Square, Markfort, MN 58988

Phone: +8215934114615

Job: Hospitality Director

Hobby: tabletop games, Foreign language learning, Leather crafting, Horseback riding, Swimming, Knapping, Handball

Introduction: My name is Kelle Weber, I am a magnificent, enchanting, fair, joyous, light, determined, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.