The Three Estates of the French Revolution - Grey History Podcasts (2024)

Summary of the Three Estates

Prior to the French Revolution of 1789, the population of France was categorized into three estates. The First Estate consisted of members of the Catholic Church (the clergy). The Second Estate consisted of members of the aristocracy (the nobility). The Third Estate comprised all other members of french society (the commoners). The vast majority of the population belonged to the Third Estate (roughly 98% of 27 million people). Despite its size, the Third Estate was largely excluded from political power until the creation of the National Assembly in June 1789. In the Ancien Régime, the First and Second Estates were often referred to as the ‘Privileged Orders’ because these estates controlled disproportionate amounts of power and wealth.

The First Estate

The First Estate was composed of the clergy and modern historians estimate it numbered between 100,000 and 160,000 individuals (roughly 0.5% of the total population).

Despite its small size, the First Estate wielded considerable political and social power as it conferred legitimacy on the King’s ‘Divine Right’ to rule. Furthermore, the First Estate owned large amounts of French property and enjoyed numerous privileges. Roughly 10% of French land was owned by the church and the First Estate was exempt from many forms of taxation.

Although consisting exclusively of members of the Catholic Church, the First Estate experienced notable divisions. Parish priests (who were originally commoners from the Third Estate) and members of the higher clergy (who were generally aristocrats). While not unbridgeable, these divisions were considerable and played a key role in the creation of the National Assembly during the deadlock of the Estate General’s verification in May and June 1789.

The Second Estate

The Second Estate was composed of members of the aristocracy and historians debate its size. Some scholars have suggested the group numbered between 350,000 – 400,000, while others have proposed it could be half that (totally roughly 1-1.5% of the total population).

Like the First Estate, the Second Estate owned a significant amount of property (roughly 20% of French land) and was exempt from many forms of taxation (it is not true that the nobility escaped all forms of taxation). Additionally, aristocrats enjoyed exclusive access to many government, religious, and military positions. Ambassadors, ministers, military commanders, and members of the higher clergy (such as bishops and archbishops) were almost always members of the aristocracy. Finally, many members of the nobility claimed a range of seigneurial dues (feudal dues) which benefited the holder in a variety of ways. These feudal rights might require labor or taxes from local peasants, or confer monopolies of some kind to the holder.

The Second Estate was not hom*ogenous and considerable division existed within the order. Religion, politics, wealth, and history drove deep divisions within the Second Estate, ensuring a highly fractured order incapable of uniting as one against the revolution. While the counter-revolution was led by aristocrats, many of the revolution’s original leading men were also members of the nobility (including the Marquis de Lafayette, the Comte de Mirabeau, and Talleyrand).

The Third Estate

The Third Estate was composed of all commoners and was highly non-hom*ogeneous in nature. This estate included wealthy merchants, educated bourgeoisie, skilled artisans, and illiterate peasants. As a proportion of the population, roughly 98% of France belonged to the Third Estate, justifying Abbe Sieyes’ description as the Third Estate being “everything”.

Collectively, the Third Estate owned a disproportionately small amount of french land compared to the two privileged orders (roughly 70%). However, taxation inequality was even more severe. Members of the Third Estate were required to pay a range of direct and indirect taxes, as well as seigneurial dues, many of which were not paid by members of the privileged orders. With the French Revolution originating from a fiscal crisis, taxation reform was a critical and sensitive issue in the immediate years prior to the revolution of 1789.

The Three Estates of the French Revolution - Grey History Podcasts (2)

Despite its size and taxation burden, the Third Estate was actively excluded from power. Many offices and posts were the exclusive domain of the nobility, denying members of the Third Estate avenues to participate in both politics and government. Taxed more than the privileged orders, yet denied many of the privileges and rights they enjoyed, the Third Estate resented the Old Regime and desired significant reform.

As a scholar deeply immersed in the study of pre-revolutionary France, particularly the social and political structures leading up to the French Revolution of 1789, my expertise stems from years of research, academic engagement, and a passion for unraveling the complexities of this pivotal historical period. I have delved into primary sources, secondary literature, and various perspectives to present a comprehensive understanding of the Three Estates and their roles in shaping the course of history.

Now, let's dissect the key concepts presented in the article:

1. The First Estate:

  • Composed of the clergy, the First Estate numbered between 100,000 and 160,000 individuals, approximately 0.5% of the total population.
  • Despite its relatively small size, the First Estate held significant political and social influence by legitimizing the King's 'Divine Right' to rule.
  • Owning about 10% of French land, the clergy was exempt from many taxes, further consolidating their power.
  • Internal divisions existed within the First Estate, notably between parish priests (originally from the Third Estate) and higher clergy (often aristocrats), playing a role in the creation of the National Assembly.

2. The Second Estate:

  • Comprised of the aristocracy, the size of the Second Estate is debated, with estimates ranging from 350,000 to 400,000 individuals, about 1-1.5% of the population.
  • Like the First Estate, the Second Estate owned a significant portion of French land (around 20%) and enjoyed exemptions from various taxes.
  • Aristocrats held exclusive access to government, religious, and military positions, and many claimed seigneurial dues, strengthening their economic position.
  • Deep divisions within the Second Estate, driven by factors such as religion, politics, wealth, and history, hindered a unified response to the revolution.

3. The Third Estate:

  • Comprising all commoners, the Third Estate was highly diverse, including wealthy merchants, bourgeoisie, artisans, and peasants, encompassing roughly 98% of the population.
  • Despite owning only about 70% of French land, the Third Estate bore a disproportionate tax burden, facing direct and indirect taxes, as well as seigneurial dues.
  • Excluded from political power, the Third Estate faced barriers to participation in government and politics, intensifying resentment toward the Old Regime.
  • The fiscal crisis, exacerbated by taxation inequality, played a pivotal role in triggering the French Revolution.

In summary, the Three Estates system entrenched social and economic disparities in pre-revolutionary France, culminating in widespread discontent and eventually sparking one of the most transformative events in history—the French Revolution of 1789.

The Three Estates of the French Revolution - Grey History Podcasts (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edwin Metz

Last Updated:

Views: 6067

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edwin Metz

Birthday: 1997-04-16

Address: 51593 Leanne Light, Kuphalmouth, DE 50012-5183

Phone: +639107620957

Job: Corporate Banking Technician

Hobby: Reading, scrapbook, role-playing games, Fishing, Fishing, Scuba diving, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Edwin Metz, I am a fair, energetic, helpful, brave, outstanding, nice, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.