The Only Free Lunch in the Stock Market – Valuist (2024)

The Only Free Lunch in the Stock Market – Valuist (1)

June 25, 2020 Jake Money Management, Philosophy


When I say, “Valuist” investments, I’m not referring to value investing specifically (though I am a big fan). I’m talking about earning the best risk-adjusted returns from the stock market while spending the least amount of time doing it. If you read Valuist’s article, How To Invest When the Stock Market is Crashing, you know I’m an avid supporter of Index Funds. But, I haven’t really explained why I think Index Funds are the only free lunch in the stock market, and I haven’t disclosed my personal investments.

I thought that Index Fund investing was common knowledge and commonly adhered to, at least for core retirement investing. However, it seems that I have been too insulated; In Twitter personal finance/money circles dividend investing, cryptocurrency investing and precious metals are constantly being touted. Of course there’s nothing wrong with alternative investing, I work in the alternative investment industry, I just didn’t realize they were so popular among first-time investors. When a “How to” guide can, in under 20 pages, show you how to beat the stock market’s average return, I get a little dubious. Though someone has to make up the 8% of people that can consistently “beat” the stock market over time, most of these investors likely represent the 92% that cannot.

A 100% allocation to stocks is aggressive, but what if there are 1000’s of them?

When you first start learning about investing you are confronted with the question of “asset allocation” and how comfortable you are with assuming risk. However, it is hard to really understand asset allocation based on an article or a survey. To really understand your tolerance for risk and determine how you want to invest, you need to understand how stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, etc. work. What may be true for individually-owned stocks might not apply to mutual funds and ETFs. For example, it is commonly held that a 100% allocation to stocks is highly aggressive, and really it is, but being aggressive doesn’t necessarily entail the risk of loss. When we are talking about an Index Fund that tracks the entire US stock market, for instance, that risk is mitigated over time. That’s because of the sheer number of stocks in the index and the fact that you are merely invested in the market-at-large, not individual stocks representing companies that could go bankrupt and wipe out your investment. The only ways to go bust with Index Fund investing are to sell at a loss, or if the entire market collapses forever.

That’s not to say that investing in Index Funds is risk-free. Because Total-Market Index Funds track large swaths of the stock market, when the stock market crashes so too does the index. If that happens at the wrong time, say just before you are set to retire, it can prove disastrous to your financial planning. What they really mean when they talk about risk tolerance, is how likely you are to sell if you see your funds crashing on paper. It is easy to assume you will hold strong during a market crash, or even buy stocks at a discount, but it is another thing to actually do it. Personally, I am comfortable with 100% allocation to stocks right now, so long as my investment portfolio is comprised of low cost, broadly diversified index funds. If you compare a portfolio that contains only a total U.S. stock market fund (VTI for instance) to one comprised of individual stocks, which are far less diversified and do provide for the possibility of total loss, it is clear that the risk-adjusted return of the index fund is superior.

As with all investment portfolios, as you approach the time when you need to protect capital you must reassess your ideal asset allocation and adjust your holdings accordingly. I don’t actively endorse any particular fund/s.

Here are some other reasons that Index Funds can produce better risk-adjusted returns:

  • You can capture a large part of the U.S. or world stock market, which has historically returned 7%-10%, with just a few ETFs or Mutual Funds. You are also likely to beat most actively managed investment portfolios with a simple, self re-balancing fund.
  • You don’t have to learn technical stock analysis and try to outwit the thousands of experts (and super computers) who are also trying to beat the market’s average return.
  • You can invest passively, meaning not having someone at the helm buying and selling, which can keep fees incredibly low. That doesn’t mean that you are investing in an inflexible/static fund, the S&P 500, for instance, is a market-capitalization-weighted collection of the500biggest U.S. stocks and the list changes from time to time.

Here are some reasons that individual stocks are better

Although I’ve spent most of this article espousing the benefits of index fund investing, there is a really good reason why so many people decide to invest in individual stocks and alternative investments. You give your self the possibility of finding a “unicorn” a stock that gives you supernatural returns and allows you to retire without taking the normal path.

  • You’ll never find the next Facebook by investing in Index Funds. Sure, you’ll own it if it falls within the index you’re invested in, but the majority of the gargantuan gains will be offset by the losses of other companies.
  • If you are knowledgeable about stock analysis, you are incredibly disciplined and have a working strategy, you could actually do better than the index (though it is debatable how long you could actually do it).

The Valuist Investment Portfolio

Like most people, my family’s personal savings and investments are split into various buckets: emergency cash, employer-provided retirement accounts, Roth IRAs and taxable accounts etc. To manage these accounts and easily view my asset allocation, I have developed a robust and flexible investment spreadsheet that also reflects my total exposure to various markets (which you can get for free!). However, what I found was that the best way to keep my total investment portfolio, across all accounts, simple and aligned with my goals, is to invest in the same thing in every account- the total U.S. stock market.

VTSAX/VTI make up the majority of my portfolio. It is the sole holding in my Simple IRA and the majority of our Roth IRAs and taxable accounts. This one fund provides a huge amount of diversity, though perhaps not as much as a world market fund. It has historically done well and, so long as I can wait out the crashes, it is next to impossible to fail irretrievably.

Not that I don’t hold other funds, I also hold positions in VBR (small cap value fund), VWO (emerging markets) and money market accounts (cash) awaiting deployment during opportune buying times. I believe that there is a long term benefit to holding a higher allocation to value, stocks considered to be selling at a discount relative to the strength of their business. There may also be a benefit to holding an allocation to emerging markets, as they may someday make a comeback and eventually represent a large cross-section of the world markets that I would have no access to with a mostly large-cap US stock fund like VTSAX/VTI.

The Valuist Investment Portfolio

The Only Free Lunch in the Stock Market – Valuist (2)

Final Considerations: How I perceive market returns

Though we throw a lot of figures around in personal finance, I am only really concerned with total return. That is, how much total cash comes out of my pocket, versus the total amount currently in our combined accounts. I don’t care too much about annual returns because I don’t think annually, I think in decades. I also don’t care about dividends because they aren’t derived from my income, and all of mine are immediately reinvested. Thus, with the Valuist Free Investment Spreadsheet I present returns in two ways:

  • Total Contributions plus dividends reinvested, employer matching, exchanges/sales, capital gains/losses, minus withdrawals & fees
  • Contributions minus withdrawals only (without respect to reinvested dividends, employer matching etc.) – This is the figure I really care about

Even after the recent market dip and apparent V-shaped recovery, temporary as it may be, this simple portfolio has a total return of 37.31%. This figure obviously changes daily, but when the market is surging it returns well over 40%. According to Vanguard, the annual return is currently 7.6%, but hovered around 10% before the stock market correction.

What is your preferred method of investing and why? Let me know in the comments!

The Only Free Lunch in the Stock Market – Valuist (3)

Also by Valuist:

How to Buy Houses in a Highly Competitive Real Estate MarketTop 5 Ways to Use Credit Card Loyalty Rewards (and What to Avoid)15 Money Mistakes You Can't Afford To MakePoor, Cheap or Minimalist?The Pros and Cons of Rapidly Paying Down Your Mortgage

Leave a Reply

The Only Free Lunch in the Stock Market – Valuist (2024)

FAQs

What is the only free lunch in investing? ›

Harry Markowitz is reported to have said that “diversification is the only free lunch in investing”. This is the notion that holding a broader range of assets can result in better returns without assuming more risk.

What does it mean to say investing has no free lunch? ›

In economics, free lunch implies that there is no cost to an individual for a particular good or service; however, that cost is borne by another individual. In investing, a free lunch refers to a profit without risk, which is not truly possible as all investments have risks, regardless of how small that risk may be.

Why is diversification considered investing free lunch? ›

While there are no guarantees in the financial markets, broad diversification and rebalancing can provide us an opportunity to enhance returns while decreasing risk. No wonder Harry Markowitz called it a free lunch!

What is the relationship between the expected rate of return and the investment risk? ›

key takeaways

A positive correlation exists between risk and return: the greater the risk, the higher the potential for profit or loss. Using the risk-reward tradeoff principle, low levels of uncertainty (risk) are associated with low returns and high levels of uncertainty with high returns.

What did Harry Markowitz do? ›

Harry Markowitz revolutionized the field of finance by introducing the concept of portfolio optimization with his modern Portfolio Theory, providing a mathematical framework for investors to make informed decisions about risk and return when constructing investment portfolios.

Why do economist say there is no free lunch? ›

"There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" (TANSTAAFL) is a phrase that describes the cost of decision-making and consumption. TANSTAAFL suggests that things that appear to be free will always have some hidden or implicit cost to someone, even if it is not the individual receiving the benefit.

What is the no free lunch rule? ›

In mathematical folklore, the "no free lunch" (NFL) theorem (sometimes pluralized) of David Wolpert and William Macready, alludes to the saying "no such thing as a free lunch", that is, there are no easy shortcuts to success.

Which investment has the most inflation risk? ›

For investors, bonds are considered most vulnerable to inflationary risk.

What do economists mean when they say there is no such thing as a free lunch or anything similar? ›

There isn't no such thing as free lunch is an economic proverb which means nothing comes free of cost, or in other words, everything comes with a trade-off. (Trade-off means a situation where one loses something to take a decision).

What does Warren Buffett say about diversification? ›

Diversification is a protection against ignorance,” Buffett said. “I mean, if you want to make sure that nothing bad happens to you relative to the market… There's nothing wrong with that. That's a perfectly sound approach for somebody who does not feel they know how to analyze businesses.”

What is the 5 40 diversification rule? ›

No single asset can represent more than 10% of the fund's assets; holdings of more than 5% cannot in aggregate exceed 40% of the fund's assets. This is known as the "5/10/40" rule. There are certain exceptions for government issued securities and for index tracking funds.

What does Charlie Munger think about diversification? ›

The right takeaways from Charlie Munger

In wrapping things up, I'll point out that Munger admitted that a diversified portfolio is right for many investors. Munger once said, "The idea of diversification makes sense to a point if you don't know what you're doing." Of course, no one likes to admit any ignorance.

Which investment has the least liquidity? ›

Real estate, private equity, and venture capital investments usually have lower liquidity due to longer sale duration and lower trading volumes.

What is the name of a person who invests money to make a profit? ›

An investor is someone who provides (or invests) money or resources for an enterprise, such as a corporation, with the expectation of financial or other gain.

Why might an investor want blue chip stocks in their portfolio? ›

Stability: Blue Chip companies have track records of consistency, with stable revenue and profit growth throughout the years. That, in tandem with their long-term growth are some of the reasons why they are lauded by many as a great return on investment. They are also less vulnerable to market fluctuations.

What is the free lunch theory? ›

In mathematical folklore, the "no free lunch" (NFL) theorem (sometimes pluralized) of David Wolpert and William Macready, alludes to the saying "no such thing as a free lunch", that is, there are no easy shortcuts to success. It appeared in the 1997 "No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimization".

What is the no free lunch model? ›

In computational complexity and optimization the no free lunch theorem is a result that states that for certain types of mathematical problems, the computational cost of finding a solution, averaged over all problems in the class, is the same for any solution method.

Is arbitrage a free lunch? ›

Informally speaking, a market allows for a free lunch with vanishing risk if there are admissible strategies, which can be chosen arbitrarily close to an arbitrage strategy, i.e., these strategies start with no wealth, end up with positive wealth with probability greater zero (free lunch) and the probability of ending ...

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Patricia Veum II

Last Updated:

Views: 6137

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Patricia Veum II

Birthday: 1994-12-16

Address: 2064 Little Summit, Goldieton, MS 97651-0862

Phone: +6873952696715

Job: Principal Officer

Hobby: Rafting, Cabaret, Candle making, Jigsaw puzzles, Inline skating, Magic, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Patricia Veum II, I am a vast, combative, smiling, famous, inexpensive, zealous, sparkling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.