The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks (2024)

It's hard not to think it's a big deal when a branch of the Federal Reserve system calls for the breakup of major American banks.

The bank has just released its annual report, and the title of the letter is: Choosing the Road to Prosperity Why We Must End Too Big to Fail—Now.

Here's the full letter from Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher, generally known as one of the most hawkish and conservative Fed Presidents.

The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks (1)

Letter from the
President
If you are running one of the “too-big- to-fail” (TBTF) banks—alternatively known as “systemically important financial institutions,” or SIFIs—I doubt you are going to like what you read in this annual report essay written by Harvey Rosenblum, the head of the Dallas Fed’s Research Department, a highly regarded Federal Reserve veteran of 40 years and the former president of the National Association for Business Economics.

Memory fades with the passage of time. Yet it is important to recall that it was in recog- nition of the precarious position in which the TBTF banks and SIFIs placed our economy in 2008 that the U.S. Congress passed into law the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd–Frank). While the act established a number of new macroprudential features to help promote financial stability, its overarching purpose, as stated unambiguously in its preamble, is ending TBTF.

However, Dodd–Frank does not eradi- cate TBTF. Indeed, it is our view at the Dallas Fed that it may actually perpetuate an already dangerous trend of increasing banking industry concentration. More than half of banking industry assets are on the books of just five institutions. The top 10 banks now account for 61 percent of commercial banking assets, substantially more than the 26 percent of only 20 years ago; their combined assets equate to half of our nation’s GDP. Further, as Rosenblum argues in his essay, there are signs that Dodd– Frank’s complexity and opaqueness may evenbe working against the economic recovery. In addition to remaining a lingering threat to financial stability, these megabanks signifi- cantly hamper the Federal Reserve’s ability to properly conduct monetary policy.

They were a primary culprit in magnifying the financial crisis, and their presence continues to play an impor- tant role in prolonging our economic malaise.There are good reasons why this recovery has remained frustratingly slow compared with periods following previous recessions, and I believe it has very little to do with the Federal Reserve. Since the onset of the Great Recession, we have undertaken a number of initiatives— some orthodox, some not—to revive and kick-start the economy. As I like to say, we’ve filled the tank with plenty of cheap, high-octane gasoline. But as any mechanic can tell you, it takes more than just gas to propel a car.

The lackluster nature of the recovery is certainly the byproduct of the debt-infused boom that preceded the Great Recession, as is the excessive uncertainty surrounding the actions—or rather, inactions—of our fiscal au- thorities in Washington. But to borrow an anal- ogy Rosenblum crafted, if there is sludge on the crankshaft—in the form of losses and bad loans on the balance sheets of the TBTF banks—then the bank-capital linkage that greases the engine of monetary policy does not function properly to drive the real economy. No amount of liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve can change this.

Perhaps the most damaging effect of prop- agating TBTF is the erosion of faith in American capitalism. Diverse groups ranging from the Occupy Wall Street movement to the Tea Party argue that government-assisted bailouts of reckless financial institutions are sociologically and politically offensive. From an economic perspective, these bailouts are certainly harmful to the efficient workings of the market.

I encourage you to read the following essay. The TBTF institutions that amplified and prolonged the recent financial crisis remain a hindrance to full economic recovery and to the very ideal of American capitalism.

It is imperative that we end TBTF. In my view, downsizing the behemoths over time into institutions that can be prudently managed and regulated across borders is the appropriate policy response. Only thencantheprocessof “creativedestruction”— which America has perfected and practiced with such effectiveness that it led our country to unprecedented economic achievement— work its wonders in the financial sector, just as it does elsewhere in our economy. Only then will we have a financial system fit and proper for serving as the lubricant for an economy as dynamic as that of the United States.

Advertisem*nt

Later in the report, there's this explainer of how Too Big To Fail is a perversion of capitalism:

TBTF: A Perversion of Capitalism

A n unfortunate side effect of the government’s massive aid to TBTF banks has been an erosion of faith in American capitalism. Ordinary workers and consumers who might usually thank capitalism for their higher living standards have seen a perverse side of the system, where they see that normal rules of markets don’t apply to the rich, powerful and well-connected.

Here are some ways TBTF has violated basic tenets of a capitalist sys-tem:

Capitalism requires the freedom to succeed and the freedom to fail.
Hard work and good decisions should be rewarded. Perhaps more impor- tant, bad decisions should lead to failure—openly and publicly. Econo- mist Allan Meltzer put it this way:“Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin.”

Capitalism requires government to enforce the rule of law. This requires maintaining a level playing field.The privatization of profits and socializa- tion of losses is completely unacceptable.TBTF undermines equal treat- ment, reinforcing the perception of a system tilted in favor of the rich and powerful.

Capitalism requires businesses and individuals be held accountable for the consequences of their actions. Accountability is a key ingredient for maintaining public faith in the economic system.The perception—and the reality—is that virtually nobody has been punished or held account- able for their roles in the financial crisis.

The idea that some institutions are TBTF inexorably erodes the founda- tions of our market-based system of capitalism.

This chart from the report shows nicely how much more concentrated things have become.

The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks (2)

Dallas Fed
The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks (2024)

FAQs

Who owns the 12 Federal Reserve banks? ›

Federal Reserve Banks' stock is owned by banks, never by individuals. Federal law requires national banks to be members of the Federal Reserve System and to own a specified amount of the stock of the Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve district where they are located.

Do banks get money from the Federal Reserve? ›

Key Takeaways. Banks can borrow at the discount rate from the Federal Reserve to meet reserve requirements. The Fed charges banks the discount rate, commonly higher than the rate that banks charge each other. Banks can borrow from each other at the federal funds rate.

Why does the Federal Reserve require commercial banks to have reserves? ›

Reason why reserves are required

Reserves are required to meet customers' expected or sudden demand for money. This is to avoid default risk and stop people from panicking. The aim is to meet the demand for withdrawals which ensures the public of continuous flow of banking services.

Why do banks borrow from the Fed? ›

Federal Reserve lending to depository institutions (the "discount window") plays an important role in supporting the liquidity and stability of the banking system and the effective implementation of monetary policy.

Who owns most of the reserve banks? ›

The Reserve Bank has shareholders from South Africa and many other parts of the world, including Germany, France, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway. 110 individuals and entities own the maximum of 10,000 shares, owning over half of the SARB's issued shares.

Is the Federal Reserve bank owned by the United States? ›

The Federal Reserve Banks are not a part of the federal government, but they exist because of an act of Congress. Their purpose is to serve the public. So is the Fed private or public? The answer is both.

Can banks legally loan money? ›

A national bank may make, sell, purchase, participate in, or otherwise deal in loans and interests in loans that are not secured by liens on, or interests in, real estate, subject to such terms, conditions, and limitations prescribed by the Comptroller of the Currency and any other applicable Federal law.

Do credit unions borrow from the Fed? ›

Over time, credit unions have gained access to federal contingent liquidity sources (for example, credit unions who qualify may now borrow from the Federal Reserve discount window), but the CLF continues to be an important back-up source of liquidity for both Federal- and state-chartered credit unions.

What is the maximum amount a bank can lend? ›

A legal lending limit is the most a bank or thrift can lend to a single borrower. The legal limit for national banks is 15% of the bank's capital. If the loan is secured by readily marketable securities, the limit is raised by 10%, bringing the total to 25%.

How much cash must a bank have on hand? ›

A bank's reserves are calculated by multiplying its total deposits by the reserve ratio. For example, if a bank's deposits total $500 million, and the required reserve is 10%, multiply 500 by 0.10. The bank's required minimum reserve is $50 million.

How much cash do banks keep on hand? ›

Banks tend to keep only enough cash in the vault to meet their anticipated transaction needs. Very small banks may only keep $50,000 or less on hand, while larger banks might keep as much as $200,000 or more available for transactions. This surprises many people who assume bank vaults are always full of cash.

Who controls the Federal Reserve? ›

The Board of Governors--located in Washington, D.C.--is the governing body of the Federal Reserve System. It is run by seven members, or "governors," who are nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed in their positions by the U.S. Senate.

How much does the Fed charge banks to borrow money? ›

The current Fed rate is 5.25% to 5.50%. That's according to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the monetary policymaking part of the Federal Reserve that holds eight scheduled meetings a year to set the federal funds rate.

Why aren't banks lending money? ›

Crippled by a high-rate environment and an inflationary economy, the banking industry is tightly holding onto their deposits instead of lending the cash to small businesses.

Where do banks get the money to lend? ›

Primary reserves are cash, deposits due from other banks, and the reserves required by the Federal Reserve System. Secondary reserves are securities banks purchase, which may be sold to meet short-term cash needs. These securities are usually government bonds.

Does the President have control over the Federal Reserve? ›

Presidents have the ability to influence the Fed through their appointments, but that authority can be limited because of the checks and balances built into the central-bank system.

Who profits from the Federal Reserve? ›

The Federal Reserve transfers its net earnings to the U.S. Treasury.

Are the Federal Reserve banks owned by the multiple choice? ›

The Federal Reserve Banks are owned by the Board of Governors.

How much is the Federal Reserve bank worth? ›

Overall, as shown in table 1, the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet increased from about $7.4 trillion at the end of 2020 to nearly $8.5 trillion as of September 29, 2021. On the asset side of the balance sheet, this increase was concentrated in securities held outright.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Frankie Dare

Last Updated:

Views: 6289

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Frankie Dare

Birthday: 2000-01-27

Address: Suite 313 45115 Caridad Freeway, Port Barabaraville, MS 66713

Phone: +3769542039359

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Baton twirling, Stand-up comedy, Leather crafting, Rugby, tabletop games, Jigsaw puzzles, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Frankie Dare, I am a funny, beautiful, proud, fair, pleasant, cheerful, enthusiastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.