Switzerland Model BIT (1995) - Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT) (2024)

Title

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SWISS CONFEDERATION

AND

ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Preamble

The Swiss Federal Council and the Government of > Desiring to intensify economic cooperation to the mutual benefit of both States,

Intending to create and maintain favourable conditions for investments by investors of oneContracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party,

Recognizing the need to promote and protect foreign investments with the aim to foster the economic prosperity of both States,

Have agreed as follows:

Body

Article 1. Definitions

For the Purpose of this Agreement:

(1) the Term "investor" Refers with Regard to Either Contracting Party To

(a) natural persons who, according to the law of that Contracting Party, are considered to be its nationals;

(b) legal entities, including companies, corporations, business associations and other organisations, which are constituted or otherwise duly organised under the law of that Contracting Party and have their seat, together with real economic activities, in the territory of that same Contracting Party;

(c) legal entities established under the law of any country which are, directly or indirectly, controlled by nationals of that Contracting Party or by legal entities having their seat, together with real economic activities, in the territory of that Contracting Party.

(2) The term "investments" shall include every kind of assets in particular:

(a) movable and immovable property as well as any other rights in rem, such as servitudes, mortgages, liens, pledges and usufructs;

(b) shares, parts or any other kinds of participation in companies; (c) claims to money or to any performance having an economic value;

(d) copyrights, industrial property rights (such as patents, utility models, industrial designs or models, trade or service marks, trade names, indications of origin), know-how and goodwill;

(e) concessions under public law, including concessions to search for, extract or exploit natural resources as well as all other rights given by law, by contract or by decision of the authority in accordance with the law.

(3) The term "returns" means the amounts yielded by an investment and includes in particular, profits, interest, capital gains, dividends, royalties and fees.

(4) The term "territory" includes the maritime areas adjacent to the coast of the State concerned, to the extent to which that State may exercise sovereign rights or jurisdiction in those areas according to international law.

Article 2. Scope of Application

The present Agreement shall apply to investments in the territory of one Contracting Party made in accordance with its laws and regulations by investors of the other Contracting Party, whether prior to or after the entry into force of the Agreement.

Article 3. Promotion, Admission

(1) Each Contracting Party shall in its territory promote as far as possible investments by investors of the other Contracting Party and admit such investments in accordance with its laws and regulations.

(2) When a Contracting Party shall have admitted an investment on its territory, it shall grant the necessary permits in connection with such an investment and with the carrying out of licensing agreements and contracts for technical, commercial or administrative assistance. Each Contracting Party shall, whenever needed, endeavour to issue the necessary authorizations concerning the activities of consultants and other qualified persons of foreign nationality.

Article 4. Protection, Treatment

(1) Investments and returns of investors of each Contracting Party shall at all times be accorded fair and equitable treatment and shall enjoy full protection and security in the territory of the other Contracting Party. Neither Contracting Party shall in any way impair by unreasonable or discriminatory measures the management, maintenance, use, enjoyment, extension, or disposal of such investments.

(2) Each Contracting Party shall in its territory accord investments or returns of investors of the other Contracting Party treatment not less favourable than that which it accords to investments or returns of its own investors or to investments or returns of investors of any third State, whichever is more favourable to the investor concerned.

(3) Each Contracting Party shall in its territory accord investors of the other Contracting Party, as regards the management, maintenance, use, enjoyment or disposal of their investments, treatment not less favourable than that which it accords to its own investors or investors of any third State, whichever is more favourable to the investor concerned.

(4) If a Contracting Party accords special advantages to investors of any third State by virtue of an agreement establishing a free trade area, a customs union or a common market or by virtue of an agreement on the avoidance of double taxation, it shall not be obliged to accord such advantages to investors of the other Contracting Party.

Article 5. Free Transfer

Each Contracting Party in whose territory investments have been made by investors of the other Contracting Party shall grant those investors the free transfer of the amounts relating to these investments, in particular of:

(a) returns;

(b) repayments of loans;

(c) amounts assigned to cover expenses relating to the management of the investment;

(d) royalties and other payments deriving from rights enumerated in Article 1, paragraph (2), letters (c), (d) and (e) of this Agreement;

(e) additional contributions of capital necessary for the maintenance or development of the investment;

(f) the proceeds of the partial or total sale or liquidation of the investment, including possible increment values.

Article 6. Dispossession, Compensation

(1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall take, either directly or indirectly, measures of expropriation, nationalization or any other measures having the same nature or the same effect against investments of investors of the other Contracting Party, unless the measures are taken in the public interest, on a non discriminatory basis, and under due process of law, and provided that provisions be made for effective and adequate compensation. Such compensation shall amount to the market value of the investment expropriated immediately before the expropriatory action was taken or became public knowledge, whichever is earlier. The amount of compensation, interest included, shall be settled in the currency of the country of origin of the investment and paid without delay to the person entitled thereto without regard to its residence or domicile.

(2) The investors of one Contracting Party whose investments have suffered losses due to a war or any other armed conflict, revolution, state of emergency or rebellion, which took place in the territory of the other Contracting Party shall benefit, on the part of this latter, from a treatment in accordance with Article 4 of this Agreement as regards restitution, indemnification, compensation or other settlement.

Article 7. Principle of Subrogation

Where one Contracting Party has granted any financial guarantee against non-commercial risks in regard to an investment by one of its investors in the territory of the other Contracting Party, the latter shall recognize the rights of the first Contracting Party by virtue of the principle of subrogation to the rights of the investor when payment has been made under this guarantee by the first Contracting Party.

Article 8. Disputes between a Contracting Party and an Investor of the other Contracting Party

(1) For the purpose of solving disputes with respect to investments between a Contracting Party and an investor of the other Contracting Party and without prejudice to Article 9 of this Agreement (Disputes between Contracting Parties), consultations will take place between the parties concerned.

(2) If these consultations do not result in a solution within six months from the date of request for consultations and if the investor concerned gives a written consent, the dispute shall be submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, instituted by the Convention of Washington of March 18, 1965, for the settlement of disputes regarding investments between States and nationals of other States.

Each party may start the procedure by addressing a request to that effect to the Secretary-General of the Centre as foreseen by Article 28 and 36 of the above-mentioned Convention. Should the parties disagree on whether the conciliation or arbitration is the most appropriate procedure, the investor concerned shall have the choice. The Contracting Party which is party to the dispute can, at no time whatsoever during the settlement procedure or the execution of the sentence, allege the fact that the investor has received, by virtue of an insurance contract, a compensation covering the whole or part of the incurred damage.

(3) A company which has been incorporated or constituted according to the laws in force on the territory of the Contracting Party and which, prior to the origin of the dispute, was under the control of nationals or companies of the other Contracting Party, is considered, in the sense of the Convention of Washington and according to its Article 25 (2) (b), as a company of the latter.

(4) Neither Contracting Party shall pursue through diplomatic channels a dispute submitted to the Centre, unless

(a) the Secretary-General of the Centre or a commission of conciliation or an arbitral tribunal decides that the dispute is beyond the jurisdiction of the Centre, or

(b) the other Contracting Party does not abide by and comply with the award rendered by an arbitral tribunal.

Article 9. Disputes between Contracting Parties

(1) Disputes between Contracting Parties regarding the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Agreement shall be settled through diplomatic channels.

(2) If both Contracting Parties cannot reach an agreement within six months after the beginning of the dispute between themselves, the latter shall, upon request of either Contracting Party, be submitted to an arbitral tribunal of three members. Each Contracting Party shall appoint one arbitrator, and these two arbitrators shall nominate a chairman who shall be a national of a third State.

(3) If one of the Contracting Parties has not appointed its arbitrator and has not followed the invitation of the other Contracting Party to make that appointment within two months, the arbitrator shall be appointed upon the request of that Contracting Party by the President of the International Court of Justice.

(4) If both arbitrators cannot reach an agreement about the choice of the chairman within two months after their appointment, the latter shall be appointed upon the request of either Contracting Party by the President of the International Court of Justice.

(5) If, in the cases specified under paragraphs (3) and (4) of this Article, the President of the International Court of Justice is prevented from carrying out the said function or if he is a national of either Contracting Party, the appointment shall be made by the Vice-President, and if the latter is prevented or if he is a national of either Contracting Party, the appointment shall be made by the most senior Judge of the Court who is not a national of either Contracting Party.

(6) Subject to other provisions made by the Contracting Parties, the tribunal shall determine its procedure.

(7) The decisions of the tribunal are final and binding for each Contracting Party.

Article 10. Other Commitments

(1) If provisions in the legislation of either Contracting Party or rules of international law entitle investments by investors of the other Contracting Party to treatment more favourable than is provided for by this Agreement, such provisions shall to the extent that they are more favourable prevail over this Agreement.

(2) Each Contracting Party shall observe any obligation it has assumed with regard to investments in its territory by investors of the other Contracting Party.

Article 11. Final Provisions

(1) This Agreement shall enter into force on the day when both Governments have notified each other that they have complied with the constitutional requirements for the conclusion and entry into force of international agreements, and shall remain binding for a period of ten years. Unless written notice of termination is given six months before the expiration of this period, the Agreement shall be considered as renewed on the same terms for a period of two years, and so forth.

(2) In case of official notice as to the termination of the present Agreement, the provisions of Articles 1 to 10 shall continue to be effective for a further period of ten years for investments made before official notice was given.

Conclusion

Done in duplicate, at ,on_—( seach in [French], and [English], each text being equally authentic. [In case of any divergence of interpretation, the English text shall prevail.]

For the Swiss Federal Council For the Government of

Switzerland Model BIT (1995) - Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT) (2024)

FAQs

What is the US model BIT 1994? ›

The U.S. 1994 Model BIT provided, as BITs generally do, that, “Each Party shall at all times accord to covered investments fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security, and shall in no case accord treatment less favorable than that required by international law.”

What is the Switzerland Pakistan BIT? ›

The Switzerland–Pakistan BIT includes a so-called “umbrella clause” (Article 11) that provides, “Either Contracting Party shall constantly guarantee the observance of the commitments it has entered into with respect to the investments of the investors of the other Contracting Party.” Umbrella clauses have the potential ...

How many bilateral investment treaties are there? ›

Yet many of the multinational enterprises making those investments may not be aware of key legal protections afforded by a web of more than 2800 international agreements known as bilateral investment treaties, or BITs.

What is the purpose of bilateral treaties? ›

Bilateral investment treaties (or, BITs) are international agreements establishing the terms and conditions for private investment by nationals and companies of one country to another country.

What is a model bit? ›

First, the claim that the purpose of the Model BIT is to balance investment protection with host state's right to regulate. Second, the claim that the Model BIT aims to make the treaty provisions more precise so as to minimize arbitral discretion.

How many BITs does the US have? ›

A BIT is an agreement between two countries that sets up “rules of the road” for foreign investment in each other's countries. BITs give US investors better access to foreign markets—and on fairer terms. The United States currently has BITs with 42 countries.

Why is Switzerland no 1? ›

In the current rankings, Switzerland is number one for economic stability, safety, and lowest corruption. Jacques Pitteloud, the Swiss ambassador to the U.S., lists “economic stability, political consensus, and a historic role playing negotiator and peacemaker for other nations” as success factors.

What treaties is Switzerland in? ›

G
  • General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes.
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
  • General Agreement on Trade in Services.
  • Geneva Convention (1864)
  • Geneva Convention (1906)
  • Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War.
  • Geneva Convention on the Wounded and Sick (1929)
  • First Geneva Convention.

Why Switzerland is strong? ›

The Swiss franc is heavily backed by large reserve of gold, bonds and financial assets, which help the Swiss National Bank ensure the currency's stability during times of volatility. While many currencies plunged against an appreciating U.S. dollar in 2022, the Swiss franc held steady amid volatility in Europe.

What is BIT law? ›

The U.S. bilateral investment treaty (BIT) program helps to protect private investment, to develop market-oriented policies in partner countries, and to promote U.S. exports.

Which country has the most BITs? ›

Germany continues to be the country with the largest number of BITs (124), followed by Switzerland (95) and France and the United Kingdom (92 each).

When was the first BIT signed? ›

The first ever BIT was concluded on 25 November 1959 between Germany and Pakistan and entered into force on 28 April 1962, i.e. 2 years and 5 months after the signing of the treaty.

What is an investment under a bit? ›

Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are agreements between two countries that include rules to promote and protect two-way investment between those countries.

Are bilateral treaties legally binding? ›

Treaties may be bilateral (two parties) or multilateral (between several parties) and a treaty is usually only binding on the parties to the agreement. An agreement "enters into force" when the terms for entry into force as specified in the agreement are met.

Who does the US have bilateral treaties with? ›

United States Bilateral Investment Treaties
CountryDate of SignatureDate Entered Into Force
PanamaOctober 27, 1982May 30, 1991
PolandMarch 21, 1990August 6, 1994
RomaniaMay 28, 1992January 15, 1994
RussiaJune 17, 1992N/A5
43 more rows

What is the Switzerland of Pakistan? ›

Swat is also known to be as the Switzerland of Pakistan. Swat is a place for those who want to see the beauty of Pakistan. Swat is the historical valley in Pakistan.

Which city of Pakistan is called Mini Switzerland? ›

Swat is known as the switzerland of pakistan for its natural beauty.

What is the relationship between Pakistan and Switzerland? ›

Switzerland and Pakistan enjoy good trade and economic relations. Switzerland has always been one of the top seven foreign direct investors in Pakistan. Major Swiss companies are present in Pakistan employing around 15,000 people. In 2021, Swiss exports to Pakistan amounted to approx.

What is the CIA of Switzerland? ›

The Federal Intelligence Service (FIS) is a Swiss security policy instrument with a mission that is clearly defined in legal terms. Its core tasks are prevention and situation assessment for the political leaders.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arielle Torp

Last Updated:

Views: 5783

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arielle Torp

Birthday: 1997-09-20

Address: 87313 Erdman Vista, North Dustinborough, WA 37563

Phone: +97216742823598

Job: Central Technology Officer

Hobby: Taekwondo, Macrame, Foreign language learning, Kite flying, Cooking, Skiing, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Arielle Torp, I am a comfortable, kind, zealous, lovely, jolly, colorful, adventurous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.