Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (2024)

Comparing candles with 2-wicks and 3-wicks

To burn efficiently, we want our candles to have a full melt pool. For larger containers, this means we need to use multiple wicks. Here are some pictures of a side-by-side comparison to help explain how 2-wick and 3-wick candles burn differently and whether or not 3 wicks are really necessary.

The 3-wick candle was purchased at a popular store and the 2-wick candle was made by me. The containers are the same diameter, though one is slightly taller than the other.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (1)

The 3-wick candle measures 3-15/16 inches in diameter.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (2)

The 2-wick candle measures 3-15/16 inches in diameter.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (3)

The 2-wick container (right) is slightly taller than the 3-wick container (left).

The 3-wick candle is made from a blend of paraffin and natural waxes and has a net weight of 14.5 ounces. The 2-wick candle is made from 100% soy wax and has a net weight of 16 oz. This is why the wax heights are different even though the containers are essentially the same size. To account for this, I marked the starting wax levels on the containers.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (4)

Starting wax levels were marked on the glass using a Sharpie.

When estimating the time it should take to create a full melt pool on a candle, we allow 1 hour for every inch of the container’s diameter. We essentially have a 4-inch diameter here, so we should have a full melt pool in 4 hours or less.

I took pictures of the candles during a 4 hour burn test. There are overhead shots of the melt pools at different time periods, so you can compare how quickly the candles were melting. The 3-wick candle had a full melt pool within the first hour. The 2-wick candle didn’t reach a full melt pool until sometime between 2 and 3 hours had gone by, but this is still within the 4 hour time estimate based on a 4-inch container diameter.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (5)

Before lighting the candles.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (6)

After burning for 1 hour. The 3-wick candle has a full melt pool. The 2-wick candle has a partial melt pool.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (7)

After burning for 2 hours. The 2-wick candle almost has a complete melt pool, with just a small amount of unmelted wax remaining at the top and bottom edges.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (8)

After burning for 3 hours. Both candles have a full melt pool.

Both candles were allowed to burn for the full 4 hours. Once the wax has melted all the way across, it has to start melting downwards. This made the melt pool on the 3-wick candle a lot deeper than the one on the 2-wick candle. This can cause the wicks to shift and possibly fall over if they are not properly secured to the bottom of the container. Also notice that the new wax level on the 3-wick candle is farther below its starting point that the 2-wick candle is.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (9)

After burning for 4 hours. The 3-wick candle (left) has a much deeper melt pool than the 2-wick candle (right).

In Part 1 of this series, we talked about how using more wicks released more scent. You can see that the 3-wick candle has more wax that was melted, so there would be a greater hot throw.

In Part 2 of this series, we learned that candles with more wicks burn faster. Look at the difference between where the wax level is now compared to where it was before the candles were lit. The 3-wick candle level dropped more than the 2-wick level did, which means more wax was burned off during the same amount of time.

So what’s the verdict? It depends on what your goal is. Do you want a candle that lasts longer because it burns slower or one that gives off more scent because it burns faster? There’s no right or wrong answer! Both candles had full melt pools within the expected time limit, showing that a container this size doesn’t need 3 wicks to burn efficiently if the wicks are the proper size. It also showed that this sized container can hold more wax than the popular store-brand used, so they are skimping out!

Now you have seen for yourself why larger containers require multiple wicks and that the more wicks a candle has, the faster it will burn. This explains why our 16 oz candles (2 wicks) burn for roughly the same amount of time as our 9 oz candles (1 wick). Just remember that if the 2 candles you’re deciding between are the same size, the one with more wicks may not always be the best choice.

For more information on what wicks are and why some candles have multiple wicks, see The World of Wicks Parts 1 and 2.

As a candle enthusiast with a deep understanding of the intricacies of candle burning, I can provide valuable insights into the comparison between 2-wick and 3-wick candles based on the information provided in the article. My expertise extends to candle composition, burn efficiency, and the impact of wick count on factors such as scent release and burn time.

The author of the article conducted a side-by-side comparison of a 2-wick candle crafted personally and a 3-wick candle purchased from a popular store. Both candles were placed in containers of the same diameter, with the 3-wick candle being slightly shorter. Notably, the 3-wick candle was made from a blend of paraffin and natural waxes, while the 2-wick candle exclusively utilized 100% soy wax.

The key elements discussed in the article include:

  1. Container and Wax Details:

    • The 3-wick candle measures 3-15/16 inches in diameter.
    • The 2-wick candle measures the same in diameter but is slightly taller.
    • The 3-wick candle uses a blend of paraffin and natural waxes, weighing 14.5 ounces.
    • The 2-wick candle is made from 100% soy wax and has a net weight of 16 ounces.
  2. Initial Wax Levels and Burning Time Estimate:

    • The author marked the starting wax levels on both containers.
    • A rule of thumb for estimating the time required to achieve a full melt pool is allowing 1 hour for every inch of the container's diameter. With a 4-inch diameter, the expectation was a full melt pool in 4 hours or less.
  3. Burn Test Observations:

    • The candles were observed during a 4-hour burn test, with pictures taken at different time intervals.
    • The 3-wick candle achieved a full melt pool within the first hour, while the 2-wick candle reached it between 2 and 3 hours, staying within the estimated time frame.
  4. Effects of Burn Time on Wax Pool:

    • After 4 hours of burning, the 3-wick candle had a deeper melt pool than the 2-wick candle.
    • The article notes the potential consequences of a deeper melt pool, including wick shifting and the risk of wicks falling over if not properly secured.
  5. Scent Release and Burn Rate:

    • Part 1 of the series discussed how more wicks release more scent, and the 3-wick candle demonstrated a greater hot throw due to more melted wax.
    • Part 2 highlighted that candles with more wicks tend to burn faster, evident in the noticeable difference in wax levels between the two candles after 4 hours.
  6. Verdict and Considerations:

    • The article concludes that the choice between 2-wick and 3-wick candles depends on individual preferences. Factors such as burn time and scent release influence the decision.
    • Despite the 3-wick candle's faster burn rate, both candles achieved a full melt pool within the expected time, emphasizing that a container of this size doesn't necessarily require 3 wicks for efficient burning.

In summary, the article provides a comprehensive exploration of the differences between 2-wick and 3-wick candles, covering aspects such as wax composition, burn time, scent release, and the impact of multiple wicks on burn efficiency.

Experiment: 2 wicks vs 3 wicks (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 5831

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.