ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (2024)

Published on May 11, 2021 by Zahin Mohammed

Since the concept of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors was introduced at the Who Cares Wins conference in 20051 , it has gained significant traction among investors, asset managers and policy makers. In less than two decades, ESG and sustainable investing has grown more than 10-fold, with total assets under management associated with the theme now exceeding USD1.65tn2 . Growth was fuelled by both client demand and an unprecedented level of product development, with the total number of sustainable funds globally reaching 4,1533 at the end of December 2020.

ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (1)

With its increased popularity and acceptance, investors and asset managers have raced to integrate ESG factors into their investment processes, and many ESG-labelled securities and funds have been created. However, there is little consensus on the definition of an ESG fund, further complicating investment decisions and performance analysis, and making apples-to-apples comparison difficult. The subjectivity inherent in what ESG factors try to capture also creates a significant variation in sustainability scores or ratings across data providers, resulting in confusion among investors4 .

With ESG considerations playing a bigger role in investment decisions, there is a clear need for promoting rating transparency and standardising reporting. ESG funds are currently identified by relying on the fund name and prospectus. Beyond the label, to differentiate between ESG and non-ESG funds, we look at holdings data and standard risk factors. While a fund’s asset class or geographical focus is relatively easy to determine, other characteristics, such as establishing whether it qualifies as an ESG fund, are more difficult to assess. As a result, in the coming year, European and many global investors are likely to face a large influx of ESG disclosure requirements, whether they run specific ESG-labelled funds or not. With no signs of ESG inflows abating, the fourth quarter of 2020 saw a rise of 88% to USD152.3bn5 from the prior quarter, clearly indicating where investors are putting their money to work.

ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (2)

Globally, Europe continued to dominate the sustainable funds space over the last year, accounting for more than 80% of the total, followed by the US (13.4%). Subsequent to the growth of ESG investing in Europe, the EU has set out obligations for asset managers in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), effective from 10 March 2021. The SFDR was put in place to increase transparency and reduce risks of greenwashing (which means conveying a false impression or making something seem more environmentally friendly than it is). The policy applies only to EU asset managers and products registered and sold within the EU, and will not be part of UK law, as the SFDR became effective after Brexit. Bloomberg Intelligence estimates that by mandating greater disclosure, global ESG assets are set to exceed USD53tn by 2025, representing more than a third of the USD140.5tn in projected total AUM6 .

At the product level, the SFDR calls for a mandatory set of sustainability-related disclosures, requiring changes to product documentation and marketing material7 . The regulation stipulates that funds should be classified “light green” or “dark green”, and the classification added to periodic publications. Fund documents to be updated by asset managers will include fund prospectuses, website product information and key investor information documents (KIIDs). Funds that do not integrate sustainability factors into the investment process will fall under the “grey” or “Article 6” category.

ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (3)

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2020 asked for public comment10 on whether ESG products should follow existing rules that require a fund’s name to broadly match what it invests in. Besides the fund name, the SEC also asked whether there should be specific requirements to which funds must adhere in order to call their investments ESG or sustainable11 . Several asset managers have also set ESG targets and constraints at the firm level and updated ESG policies with new commitments and strategies. On the investor side, there has been a continued increase in the number of asset owners and managers signing up to high-level ESG commitments such as the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment12 .

The adoption of ESG considerations was not derailed by the pandemic, and their importance is set to grow in the coming years due to regulatory pressures and strong demand from asset owners. As sustainability regulation ramps up, ESG reporting requirements for asset managers and their products are likely to increase sharply. Investment managers also need to be transparent about the characteristics of their products to qualify them as sustainable. Hence, it is vital that the asset-manager community augment ESG data communication and transparency, enhancing fund reporting.

How Acuity Knowledge Partners can help

Our Fund Marketing Services arm offers a suite of services in the fields of marketing and investment communication. We support prominent investment managers in preparing market collateral and writing investment commentaries. Given our extensive experience in the reporting space, we have also been able to adapt to changes to regulations that impact marketing material. To help asset managers communicate their ESG themes better, we leverage our fund management specialists’ rich and extensive experience, built over the years through collaboration with leading investment management firms.

Sources

1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgkell/2018/07/11/the-remarkable-rise-of-esg/?sh=79b875981695

2 Morningstar report, Global Sustainable Fund Flows: Q4 2020 in Review

3 Morningstar report, Global Sustainable Fund Flows: Q4 2020 in Review

4 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-11/conflicting-esg-ratings-are-confusing-sustainable-investors

5 Morningstar report https://www.ft.com/content/a5e02050-8ac6-11e8-bf9e-8771d5404543

6 https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/esg-assets-may-hit-53-trillion-by-2025-a-third-of-global-aum/

7 https://www.intertrustgroup.com/insights/the-first-sfdr-deadline-is-fast-approaching-on-10-march-are-you-ready-to-comply/

8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32020R0852

9 https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/sustainable-dev/lu-sustainable-finance-disclosure-regulation.pdf

10 https://www.ft.com/content/ed4452e6-cd04-49d6-b2b7-6e098dc715a4

11 https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/roisman-keynote-society-corporate-governance-national-conference-2020

12 https://www.schroders.com/en/about-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability/un-pri/

Tags:

Content ManagementESG InvestingFund marketingPreSalesProject ManagementSales Enablement

What's your view?

ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (5)

Thank you for sharing your Comments

Share this on

About the Author

Zahin Mohammed

Know More

Zahin Mohammed has over 6+ years of experience in the financial services industry. His expertise areas include investment banking, writing market commentaries, attribution reports and client reporting. In his current role at Acuity Knowledge Partners, he provides support in fund marketing services for the asset management industry. Zahin holds an MBA in Finance from Vellore Institute of Technology.

ESG investing – finding solutions for a lack of standardisation (2024)

FAQs

What are the biggest challenges in ESG investing? ›

Despite the progress, ESG investing still faces several challenges:
  • Standardization and Data Gaps: There is a lack of consistent and standardized ESG data across companies and industries. ...
  • Greenwashing: Some companies may engage in "greenwashing," making false or misleading claims about their ESG credentials.
Mar 18, 2024

Is standardization of ESG reporting a good idea? ›

Standardization makes data comparable

This often results in the ESG scoring of the same company can vary widely, making it hard to interpret what the information actually implies. On the other hand, solely relying on companies' sustainability reports to screen their ESG maturity is not the way to go either.

How can I improve my ESG investing? ›

Six steps to improve your ESG performance
  1. Integrate ESG into your business strategy. ...
  2. Identify your material topics. ...
  3. Understand your ESG ratings. ...
  4. Align to global & regulatory frameworks. ...
  5. Strive for 'investment grade' data. ...
  6. Consider your communication channel.

What is a weakness of ESG investing? ›

There is a potential for “greenwashing”

Some companies may make claims about their ESG practices that are not fully supported by their actions which can lead to “greenwashing”. This may make it difficult for you as an investor to identify truly sustainable companies.

What is the controversy with ESG investing? ›

Critics say ESG investments allocate money based on political agendas, such as a drive against climate change, rather than on earning the best returns for savers.

What are the surprising risks of investing in ESG funds? ›

That means investors could be exposed to certain risks they aren't expecting. More specifically, my research found that the average ESG investor may be taking on more small-cap risk, interest-rate and inflation risk, and single-stock risk than an investor in a standard all-equity fund.

Who sets the standards for ESG? ›

The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) lays out ESG reporting guidelines through 77 distinct industry-specific metrics. SASB also offers a Materiality Finder, a web-based tool designed to help companies understand what ESG-related issues are relevant to their sector.

Who sets the standards for ESG reporting? ›

The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board — or SASB — is a non-profit organization that was built in 2011 to create a framework for industry-specific standards that are relevant to investors because they have a material impact on the business. Materiality is a large focus of these standards.

Are ESG scores standardized? ›

One limitation of ESG scores is the lack of standardization in methodologies and criteria used by the various rating agencies, which employ different approaches to assess and weight ESG factors. This can lead to inconsistent results and make it difficult for investors to compare scores across different providers.

How do you solve ESG problems? ›

To create a win-win, businesses should adopt a multi-stakeholder approach to address their complex ESG problems, by identifying and engaging with their key stakeholders, by understanding their perspectives and expectations, by building trust and mutual respect, by creating shared value and mutual benefits, and by ...

What is the most common approach for ESG investing? ›

1. Negative Screening. Negative screening is the most well-known and perhaps the most common ESG strategy.

What is the ESG standard? ›

ESG stands for environmental, social, and governance. ESG investing refers to how companies score on these responsibility metrics and standards for potential investments. Environmental criteria gauge how a company safeguards the environment.

What are the criticisms of ESG? ›

In contrast to much of the positive reception ESG has received, some evidence suggests that it isn't even offering financial benefit for investors and businesses. A study conducted by researchers at the University of Chicago found that high sustainability funds hadn't outperformed any of the lowest rated funds.

Do ESG funds perform poorly? ›

Yet Performance Was a Drag. Investors yanked a record $13 billion from U.S. sustainable funds in 2023, stung by mediocre performance and the continuing backlash against environmental, social, and governance investing.

Why is ESG underperforming? ›

Missing out on returns from the so-called "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks was one of the biggest reasons for underperformance. Meta, Alphabet, Tesla and Amazon were all excluded from certain ESG indexes due to ESG controversies or because they had a high ESG risk relative to others in their sector.

What are ESG challenges? ›

ESG-challenges and possible solutions

They are mainly used by companies working with foreign partners and financial organizations. Other organizations often lack awareness of ESG and the positive impact these standards could have on business development or face difficulties in introducing non-financial reporting.

What are the challenges faced by an investor trying to invest in an ESG compliant company? ›

Lack of Data Granularity and Provenance: Investors face challenges due to the absence of detailed data and clear data sources, hindering their ability to assess ESG risk and performance accurately.

What is the challenge in implementing ESG? ›

Some of the challenges include finding the right framework, measuring and tracking performance, accessing governance data and insights, tracking stakeholder sentiment and organizational reputation, visualizing and controlling risk mitigation, lack of standardized metrics for evaluating companies' ESG performance, ...

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6072

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.