Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (2024)

Home News Landscapes

by Alex Cooke 16 Comments

16 Comments

Full frame is generally considered the standard professional sensor size of choice, with some landscape photographers even now opting for medium format, particularly with the recent reinvention of the format. But of course, the bigger the sensor, the bigger the camera, the heavier the lenses, and the more expensive the kit. So, does a landscape photographer really need full frame?

Coming to you from Henry Turner, this interesting video compares his experience using the full frame Nikon Z 7to the Nikon D7200. As Turner points out, absolutely, all other things equal, you can expect better image quality from a full frame sensor, but, at least for a landscape photographer, a lot of the other features that also come with more expensive cameras are somewhat akin to creature comforts for a landscape photographer. And given the remarkable advances in sensor technology, cameras with APS-C sensors can produce impressively high-quality files.A lot of top landscape photographers produce such work with APS-C cameras; our own Elia Locardihas used Fuji's X Series cameras for a lot of his work. And of course, an APS-C camera often means lower prices and lighter weights — a fantastic benefit when hiking long distances with your gear. Check out the video above for Turner's full thoughts.

Topics:

Gear

Landscapes

16 Comments

About Alex Cooke Follow

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Related Articles

Can You Use a Wide Angle Lens to Create Minimalist Landscape Photography?

Photographer Straps Camera To Himself To Show How Good This Budget 50mm Lens Really Is

Is the 50mm or the 63mm a Better All-Around Lens for the Fuji GFX System?

Why the S1R Is Still One of the Best Cameras for Landscape Photographers

Should I Use a Crop Sensor or Crop an Image From a Full Frame Sensor?

Log in or register to post comments

16 Comments

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (8)

Deleted Account [Edited]

Not even a little bit.

You can quite happily produce consistently professional level work on MFT; indeed, Olympus is used by a lot of the adventure photography people.

1 inch is workable, but has fairly hard limits. I'm currently getting a 16x20 framed from a 1 inch, but I don't think I'd go bigger.

  • 2

Jacques Cornell Deleted Account

This is my experience as well. Up to 24", I can't see a difference between my 20MP GX9 images and my 42MP a7RIII images. I shot controlled tests on a tripod of a cityscape from a balcony with all my cameras and lenses, including LF1, LX100, GX85, GX8, GX9, a7III and a7RIII, and I prepped the images for printing at 24", 36" and 48" by running the RAWs through PhotoLab, exporting DNGs to LRC, then applying Super Resolution and outputting at 300dpi with output sharpening. I start to see a difference in detail between 20MP and 42MP at 36", but at 24" it's a wash. The GX9 images still look great at 36", but if I look closely enough, the a7RIII pulls ahead.

  • 3

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (10)

Deleted Account Jacques Cornell [Edited]

That sounds about right, Jacques; but increasing resolution in post is a whole other world for me.

I'm normally happy with the RX100, but I shot the attached image (one of the rare occasions I will upload a full resolution image) a couple of days ago, and the limitations are apparent in the leaves and trunks of the central tree. Although the thing that really hurt is the little white flowers on the surface of the water on the right, but then I'd probably want 100MP camera to see detail there I suspect; I kept looking at it thinking 'I wish I had a Phase One'.

charles hoffman

50 years of advances in science, electronics, and color science

it really doesn't matter that you want to go to 20x30 or 40x60
1. you look at a 40x60 print from 8ft at least, not from 11 inches
2. the most crisp picture isn't necessarily the one you want

  • 4

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (13)

Deleted Account charles hoffman

I will never be able to comprehend obtaining a hyper-sharp portrait, then turning the skin into plastic in post.

  • 1

Mark Hamilton

No you don’t, you need an eye and intent and why is it you only get this type of question asked by photographers? The camera is a tool and a means to an end. A great photograph stands on its on merits regardless of the camera used to make it. . I’d bet nobody ever asked Ernest Hemingway if he wrote the manuscript for The Old Man and the Sea with a pen, pencil or typewriter.

  • 4

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (15)

Deleted Account Mark Hamilton [Edited]

Marketers, with training in psychology, have invested a lot of effort convincing us we absolutely must have the next bright shiny object.

Studies have demonstrated cognitive dissonance is stronger if you buy into the belief voluntarily.

Similar things can be said about brand; no doubt you've noticed people get pretty ugly around that one.

And yes, what you said.

  • 2

Anthony Martin Mark Hamilton

I like Mark Hamilton's phrase ' you need an eye and intent'!...I think that it sums up the balance that sometimes appears to get lost by debaters, that constant technical manufacturers innovation in cameras (which isbvery exciting ) does not automatically produce exciting creativity, because creativity is dependent on more than technology. The original question 'do you need full-frame for landscapes?' and the answer I,ve come up with is no unless you are working in a very specific low light conditions.

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (17)

Deleted Account

I like Henry's channel.

On the head line of this article, damn, if you do im screwed.

  • 3

Malcolm Wright [Edited]

It might be me but the video shot using the Micro Four Thirds EM1 mk2 launched in 2016 stole the show.

The video shot of the sun behind the cloud which was attempted to be replicated by the Z7 beat the Z7 hands down. All that setting up of the tripod looks to have almost lost the moment.

Just 2 pictures, were they the only keepers?

The Z7 tilt screen would be useless to use as a vlogging camera, unlike the flip screen on the EM1 mk2.

Interestingly the pictures were photo stacked. Photo stacking can be very good for reducing noise so was that another ' full frame advantage' being thrown away?

This video is a good advert for the EM1 mk2, secondhand yours for around 600-700. The Nikon Z7 being newer, but still comparing to the 2016 camera, is around 3,000. Tough choice.

  • 1

Rich Umfleet

No, but it does make things easier.

  • -1

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (20)

Deleted Account Rich Umfleet

Yeah the struggle is real with my APS-C camera, I sometimes wonder how I managed to pull through.

  • 1

  • -1

Johnny Kiev

I have actually just started an Instagram channel to answer this question for myself, still new so little content for now but the idea is to see how far I can go with a Fujifilm X-T100 with kit lens and an iPhone SE 2020, both entry-level in their respective areas.
https://www.instagram.com/john.savidi/

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (22)

Deleted Account Johnny Kiev

I’ll give you a follow, but I already know the answer to your question.

  • 1

Scott Wardwell

If you want to take advantage of the benefits of the abundance of full-frame glass instead of moving to DX glass, yes, you should be shooting an FX body.

charles hoffman

what you need for landscape photography is a tripod that sets up and breaks down with a minimum of fuss
use it, and don't be afraid to move your position if the shot isn't right

  • 1

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? (2024)

FAQs

Do You Need a Full Frame Camera for Landscape Photography? ›

If you want higher resolution images and better low-light performance, a full frame camera is the way to go. If budget is a concern or you want to use crop factor

crop factor
In digital photography, the crop factor, format factor, or focal length multiplier of an image sensor format is the ratio of the dimensions of a camera's imaging area compared to a reference format; most often, this term is applied to digital cameras, relative to 35 mm film format as a reference.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Crop_factor
to give your lenses a longer effective focal length, a crop sensor camera is the better bet.

Do I need full-frame for landscape photography? ›

Full-frame Cameras are for making Large Prints

FF cameras don't produce obviously better looking pictures, they produce bigger ones. Their RAW files are huge with massive resolution. In landscape photography, the main reason for high resolution is to routinely make large prints.

What kind of camera do I need for landscape photography? ›

While the number of megapixels you need depends on how you plan to use your photos, for most landscape photographers, a camera with 12 to 24 megapixels will do the trick. This range gives you enough resolution to capture details and print your images in large sizes without compromising quality.

Is it necessary to have a full-frame camera? ›

In summary, if you can afford the higher price and don't mind the extra bulk, a full-frame camera clearly offers major advantages. It's going to give you more creative freedom, more detail, and better results. If a crop-sensor camera suits your budget better, you can absolutely still capture amazing photos.

Do professional photographers need a full-frame camera? ›

While full frames will almost always be considered the industry standard for working professionals, there are so many great camera options that the decision between the two often comes down to the individual photographer's needs and goals.

Is APS-C or full-frame better for landscape photography? ›

For wildlife and landscape photographers, though, these cameras still retain their value. For wildlife photographers, in particular, this crop can make a big difference in their photographs. The smaller sensor means that every lens reaches further on an APS-C camera than it will on full-frame.

Is Canon or Nikon better for landscape photography? ›

If you prefer to shoot sports, action and wildlife, then you will likely need a good range of telephoto lenses. This means that you should probably go with Canon. If instead you are more into landscapes, architecture and travel photography, then Nikon could be a better choice.

Which budget camera is best for landscape photography? ›

Best cameras for landscape photography
  1. Sony Alpha A7R IVA. Our best camera overall for shooting landscapes. ...
  2. Fujifilm GFX 50S II. Best affordable medium format. ...
  3. Canon EOS R5. Best Canon camera for landscapes. ...
  4. Nikon Z7 II. The best Nikon Z camera for landscape photography. ...
  5. Leica SL3. ...
  6. Nikon D850. ...
  7. Fujifilm X100V. ...
  8. Fujifilm X-T5.
Mar 11, 2024

Are phone cameras good for landscape photography? ›

In many cases, mobile phones are perfectly suited for landscape photography. They have wide lenses, get everything in focus, won't cost more money to take on planes, and don't require bulky, technical equipment to bring everywhere. It's the perfect camera for taking with you on Vacation.

Is DSLR or mirrorless better for landscape photography? ›

Conclusion. Both DSLR and mirrorless cameras have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to landscape photography. While DSLRs are renowned for their exceptional image quality, lens selection, longer battery life and durability, mirrorless cameras offer portability, convenience, and advanced features.

Is A full-frame camera better than a DSLR? ›

DSLR sensors come in full frame, or crop. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. Generally full frame cameras are better, but they're more expensive. They have a larger physical sensor and can “see” more than a crop sensor.

Why are full-frame cameras so expensive? ›

Large sensors are more expensive and harder to manufacture, making full frame cameras more expensive. As mentioned, they only work with full frame lenses, which are more expensive than cropped ones.

Why get a full-frame mirrorless camera? ›

A full-frame mirrorless camera that opens up new creative opportunities for photographers and filmmakers. "It gives you stunning full-frame quality in a package that's super portable, and it has features that can move your creativity forward," says Richard.

Do I need an expensive camera to be a professional photographer? ›

There is no arguing that a good camera is a must-have for a professional photographer. All DSLR's are much faster and most of them are more convenient to work with than point-and-shoot cameras. However, do you really need a new, expensive DSLR to learn how to shoot, and to build your portfolio? I think not.

Should I upgrade to a full-frame camera? ›

Are full-frame cameras better? Moving to a full-frame camera has many well-documented benefits. The larger image sensor generally allows for better performance in low-light conditions, which will be an advantage if you shoot interiors, weddings, indoor portraits or events, for example.

Do you need an expensive camera to be a good photographer? ›

It's true that expensive gear won't make you a better photographer. However, it's no secret that a $4000 camera is better than a $400 camera and a $2000 lens is better than a $200 lens. The main advantage of professional camera equipment is that you're able to create higher-quality image files.

What is the best frame size for landscape photography? ›

3:2 - The 35mm Format

The 3:2 format is the most common aspect ratio for landscape photography. Photo by: 'Iurie Belegurschi'.

Is medium format better for landscape photography? ›

It is the same with your choice of camera – some photographers still steer more towards medium format film cameras for landscape work rather than digital gear, for example.

Is APS-C good for landscape? ›

If your realistic answer is, “probably no larger than 16″ x 24″, you can get excellent results from the APS-C camera as long as you use good technique. In all honesty, you could hang 16″ x 24″ prints from the 24MP APS-C system and from the 51MP full frame system side by side… and no one would notice a difference.

Can photo frames be landscape? ›

Orientation At Frame It Easy

So, you could have a piece of art where one measurement is 10″, and the other is 8″. So, if you enter the measurements 10″ X 8″ you will receive a frame that's landscape (horizontal). But, if you enter the inverse order — 8″ X 10″ — you'll get a frame that's portrait.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 6242

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Birthday: 1996-12-09

Address: Apt. 141 1406 Mitch Summit, New Teganshire, UT 82655-0699

Phone: +2296092334654

Job: Technology Architect

Hobby: Snowboarding, Scouting, Foreign language learning, Dowsing, Baton twirling, Sculpting, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Francesca Jacobs Ret, I am a innocent, super, beautiful, charming, lucky, gentle, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.