Bitcoin Is Sucking Up So Much Energy, It Could Stop Being Profitable (2024)

Bitcoin Is Sucking Up So Much Energy, It Could Stop Being Profitable (1)

The Bitcoin network could use 0.5 percent of the world's energy consumption by the end of this year, and it could soon cost so much to mine the cryptocurrency that it stops being profitable.

These figures come from a new commentary published today (May 16) in the journal Joule. In it, Alex de Vries, a financial economist and blockchain specialist, carefully worked through a number of known data points — the number of bitcoin-mining computers made in the past year, the energy consumption of those computers and the minimum energy costs of cooling large facilities of tightly packed computers, among others — to arrive at an absolute lowest bound for the energy consumption of the bitcoin network today: 2.55 gigawatts, or a bit less than the energy consumption of Ireland.

By the end of 2018, de Vries calculated, based on data about ongoing bitcoin mining production, that number could rise to 7.67 gigawatts, or a bit less than the energy consumption of Austria. And that, he said in a statement, amounts to about 0.5 percent of the world's energy consumption.

This is a problem for several reasons, environmental concerns among them. But de Vries showed that it represents a particular problem for the bitcoin miners themselves: It could soon be so expensive to mine bitcoin that the process simply stops being profitable. [Top 10 Emerging Environmental Technologies]

Why is bitcoin sucking up all this energy? To understand that, you have to know a little about how the bitcoin network works.

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer digital currency. That means there's no central agency that records who owns what. Instead, bitcoin users rely on a shared, time-stamped digital record of their transactions. And maintaining that shared record, adding a "block" to it every 10 minutes or so, is the work of a competitive effort by thousands of computers all over the world. Those computers collectively perform quintillions of calculations per second, each "mining," trying to solve a math problem that will give it the right to form the next block on the chain. And the winner every 10 minutes is rewarded with 12.5 bitcoins. That's more than $100,000 at the coin's current exchange rates.

Given those incentives, bitcoin miners have filled up warehouses with computers devoted to mining. Those computers, even the most efficient ones, need a significant amount of power to run. Certain details, like how many of these computers actually get made per year, or what tricks different mining operations use to keep them cool, are industry secrets. But de Vries worked around that secretiveness to find the data he needed for his calculation.

"[This calculation] marks the first time that bitcoin miner production has been estimated with the help of upstream [chip] production numbers," he wrote. "Given the ongoing secrecy of bitcoin miner manufacturers, this could prove to be a valuable addition to the toolkit for substantiating trends in bitcoin's electricity consumption."

De Vries also pointed out that when bitcoin mining becomes more costly than profitable, that doesn't mean all the bitcoin miners will stop. Some miners, he pointed out, might steal electricity or otherwise figure out ways to mine bitcoin at no personal cost. For example, he said, one researcher mined $8,000 to $10,000 worth of bitcoin on a university supercomputer, costing the university about $150,000. Other, less-nefarious miners, he wrote, might keep mining for reasons like anonymity or libertarian ideology.

Still, de Vries wrote, bitcoin's potential to become so energy-hungry that it stops being profitable is a real threat to the network.

Originally published on Live Science.

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Bitcoin Is Sucking Up So Much Energy, It Could Stop Being Profitable (2)

Rafi Letzter

Staff Writer

Rafi joined Live Science in 2017. He has a bachelor's degree in journalism from Northwestern University’s Medill School of journalism. You can find his past science reporting at Inverse, Business Insider and Popular Science, and his past photojournalism on the Flash90 wire service and in the pages of The Courier Post of southern New Jersey.

Latest

Obsidian blade could be from Coronado expedition fabled to be looking for 'Cities of Gold'1,900-year-old coins from Jewish revolt against the Romans discovered in the Judaen desertLife-threatening 'leaks' after surgery could be flagged faster with tiny new device
See more latest►

Most Popular
At just $43.99, this is a great deal on binoculars for beginners

By Orla Loughran Hayes

April 8 solar eclipse: 6 zoos on the path of totality — and why animals react strangely to 'nighttime during the day'

By Jamie Carter

A branch of the flu family tree has died and won't be included in future US vaccines

By Nicoletta Lanese

James Webb telescope detects oldest 'dead' galaxy in the known universe — and its death could challenge cosmology

By Sharmila Kuthunur

'Should not really exist in these waters': Scientists spot gray whale, thought to be extinct in the Atlantic, off Massachusetts coast

By Jennifer Nalewicki

Woolly mammoth de-extinction inches closer after elephant stem cell breakthrough

By Sascha Pare

Earliest known stone tools in Europe are 1.4 million years old. And they weren't made by modern humans.

By Charles Q. Choi

32 U.S. cities, including New York and San Francisco, are sinking into the ocean and face major flood risks by 2050, new study reveals

By Ben Turner

More than 140 graves found by medieval abbey in Northern Ireland, including executed criminals

By Sascha Pare

Dinosaur-age sea monster with 'face full of huge, dagger-shaped teeth' discovered in Moroccan mine

By Jennifer Nalewicki

AI singularity may come in 2027 with artificial 'super intelligence' sooner than we think, says top scientist

By Keumars Afifi-Sabet

Bitcoin Is Sucking Up So Much Energy, It Could Stop Being Profitable (2024)

FAQs

Does Bitcoin consume energy? ›

The University of Cambridge's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimated worldwide bitcoin mining used 121.13 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2023. The entire country of the Netherlands, with more than 17 million people, consumed 121.6 terawatt-hours in 2022, according to the International Energy Agency.

How to solve Bitcoin energy problem? ›

'Since mining is what consumes energy, and blocks are the product of mining: the more transactions in a block, the lower the energy consumption per transaction. Similarly, the larger a block can be (measured in megabytes), the lower the energy consumption per megabyte.

Is Bitcoin a waste of energy? ›

Bitcoin alone is estimated to consume 127 terawatt-hours (TWh) a year — more than many countries, including Norway. In the United States, cryptocurrency activity is estimated to emit from 25 to 50 million tons of CO2 each year, on par with the annual emissions from diesel fuel used by US railroads.

Why does it take so much energy to make cryptocurrency? ›

Here are the key reasons why Bitcoin mining requires a substantial amount of energy: Proof of Work (PoW) Algorithm: Bitcoin's PoW algorithm (SHA-256) requires miners to solve complex cryptographic puzzles to validate transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain.

Why does Bitcoin waste so much energy? ›

Miners use specialized computers to solve puzzles around the clock to validate transactions and earn Bitcoin in return. All that computing power burns through a lot of energy.

How much electricity does Bitcoin actually use? ›

Bitcoin requires a significant amount of energy, estimated to consume about 91 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity annually, which is more than Finland uses. Another estimate suggests that Bitcoin currently consumes around 150 TWh of electricity annually.

How much electricity does 1 Bitcoin mining use? ›

The New York Times recently equated the total power consumed by Bitcoin annually to what's used by Finland in one year. The fact is that even the most efficient Bitcoin mining operation takes roughly 155,000 kWh to mine one Bitcoin. By way of comparison, the average US household consumes about 900 kWh per month.

How much energy does Bitcoin use vs banking? ›

A 2021 study by Galaxy Digital provided similar findings. It stated that Bitcoin consumed 113.89 terawatt hours (TWh) per year, while the banking sector consumed 263.72 TWh per year.

Can Bitcoin become more energy efficient? ›

In theory, a greener bitcoin is possible. The digital coin's energy consumption is tied to its underlying “proof-of-work” protocol (PoW). This is the decentralised consensus mechanism that secures the currency and prevents fraud or hacking, in the absence of oversight from banks or another centralised body.

Is Bitcoin actually bad for the environment? ›

UN Study Reveals the Hidden Environmental Impacts of Bitcoin: Carbon is Not the Only Harmful By-product. Global Bitcoin mining is highly dependent on fossil fuels, with worrying impacts on water and land in addition to a significant carbon footprint.

Can you lose money with Bitcoin mining? ›

So you'd be losing money even before the cost of the hardware. However, that doesn't mean mining is always a losing proposition. These calculations can change if the price of electricity goes down, or the value of Bitcoin goes up.

How many bitcoins are left? ›

The supply of bitcoins is replenished at a set rate of one block every ten minutes. The system design reduces the number of new bitcoins in each block by half every four years. There are only about 2 million bitcoins left. Experts predict that the last bitcoins will be mined by 2140.

Does Bitcoin use water? ›

A Bitcoin transaction uses as much water as a backyard swimming pool, according to new research. The water use of a cryptocurrency transaction is 6.2 million times higher than a credit card, a new study finds.

Does Bitcoin consume water? ›

The network is capped at handling a handful of transactions per second; a single block simply cannot fit more data. That means that while an average cashless transaction such as a credit card swipe will only consume about 2.6 milliliters of water, the average per Bitcoin transaction exceeds 16,000 liters.

How much does it cost to mine a Bitcoin? ›

Mining a Bitcoin depends on your energy rate per Kwh, it costs $11,000K to mine a Bitcoin at 10 cents per Kwh and $5,170K to mine a Bitcoin at 4.7 cents per Kwh. Learn how and if mining right for you in 2024!

Does Bitcoin mining increase the electric bill? ›

Energy-intensive crypto mining has strained local electric grids, raised electricity rates for residents, increased local air and water pollution, and prompted noise complaints from neighbors across the U.S.

How much electricity does it take to mine 1 Bitcoin? ›

How Much Electricity is Needed to Mine 1 Bitcoin? As a solo miner, an average of 266,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity is required to mine a single BITCOIN (BTC). This process would take approximately seven years to complete, demanding a monthly electricity consumption of about 143 kWh.

Is Bitcoin really bad for the environment? ›

UN Study Reveals the Hidden Environmental Impacts of Bitcoin: Carbon is Not the Only Harmful By-product. Global Bitcoin mining is highly dependent on fossil fuels, with worrying impacts on water and land in addition to a significant carbon footprint.

What percent of Bitcoin mining is renewable? ›

Amidst environmental fears, skeptics often ignore one thing: According to CryptoSlate, more than 50% of Bitcoin mining relies on renewable sources of energy. Furthermore, more than 23% of it is done using hydropower, and over 7% of those renewable mining operations rely on solar power according to the same source.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 6140

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.