Banks fined record €1.7bn over benchmark interest rate rigging cartel (2024)

The already battered reputation of banks took an expensive new hit yesterday when the European commission slapped a record €1.7bn (£1.4bn) fine on six firms – including the bailed-out Royal Bank of Scotland – for colluding to fix key interest rate benchmarks.

Joaquín Almunia, the European competition commissioner, warned that further fines were on the cards as three more banks, including HSBC, and one broker have refused to settle the long-running investigation by Brussels.

He revealed that the authorities were in the process of unmasking a fresh scandal in the currency markets that could further damage the industry and add to the vast sums banks have had to pay for their mistakes since the financial meltdown.

"This will not be the end of the story, neither for interest-rate derivatives nor for the manipulation of benchmarks," Almunia said. "One of the areas where we have received information that we are looking at very, very carefully is forex [foreign exchange]."

The latest fines – the first levied on a financial cartel by Europe since the banking crisis began – take the total penalties for rigging Libor and other key interest-rate benchmarks to £3.5bn.

Research by the London School of Economics (LSE) to be published next week will put a total of £100bn on the costs of misconduct for 10 major banks, including RBS, Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group, in the five years to the end of 2012. That total has now risen by £30bn, according to an analysis for the Guardian by MSCI ESG Research.

Roger McCormick, the LSE professor who led the research team, said: "To put that into context, the one year's budget of the 24 richest nations for international aid is £80bn, and the national health service budget is £100bn to £110bn every year."

Yesterday's announcement saw two US banks, Citigroup and JP Morgan, receive their first fines over the interest-rate rigging scandal, while the other banks received fresh penalties on top of those already imposed by regulators. Barclays, the first bank penalised for rigging Libor when it was fined £290m in June last year, was also part of the Euribor cartel, the European equivalent of Libor. However, this time the UK bank blew the whistle. In return for that help Barclays was let off another £570m fine.

Similarly, the Swiss bank UBS escaped a £2.1bn fine by telling regulators about the cartel that had been rigging yen Libor. It had already paid £940m in fines related to manipulating the London Libor rate.

Almunia said: "What is shocking about the Libor and Euribor scandals is not only the manipulation of benchmarks, which is being tackled by financial regulators worldwide, but also the collusion between banks who are supposed to be competing with each other."

The biggest fine – £600m – was on Deutsche Bank, putting pressure on the Treasury minister Sajid Javid, who was previously head of global credit trading for Asia and had seat on the board of Deutsche's international operations division until he left in 2009.

Javid said last night that while at the German bank he was not responsible for the departments hit by the fine and as a minister he had not held any talks with Brussels or any of the firms involved.

The commission also inflicted more pain on RBS, which has suspended four traders and will now pay another £320m on top of £390m already handed over to US and UK regulators. The new fine adds to its public image problems following a systems meltdown this week and recent allegations, which it denies, that it has abused its small business customers.

Its chairman, Sir Philip Hampton, said: "Today is another sobering reminder of those past failings and nobody should be in any doubt about how seriously we have taken this issue. The RBS board and new management team condemn the behaviour of the individuals who were involved in these activities."

The Euribor investigation focused on the period between September 2005 and May 2008 and the settlement involved Barclays, Deutsche Bank, RBS and Société Générale. In yen Libor, the banks involved were UBS, RBS, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup and JP Morgan. The broker RP Martin was also involved, and fined for using its contacts with banks involved in settling Libor.

Other banks yet to agree fines for fixing Euribor rates – apart from HSBC – are Crédit Agricole and JP Morgan. The money broker Icap, run by former Conservative party treasurer Michael Spencer, is still facing penalties for rigging yen Libor.

Almunia said: "Today's decision sends a clear message that the commission is determined to fight and sanction these cartels in the financial sector."

Matt Moscardi, senior analyst at MSCI ESG Research, questioned whether the penalties were as hefty as they first appeared. "If you look at RBS it is the equivalent to its revenues for five weeks. That's not much. If you think about the manipulation of a global interest rate where several trillion dollars are priced to it, you'd think they'd be more punitive."

Banks fined record €1.7bn over benchmark interest rate rigging cartel (2024)

FAQs

Banks fined record €1.7bn over benchmark interest rate rigging cartel? ›

Following several parallel investigations into manipulation of the LIBOR (London interbank offered rate) and similar financial benchmarks, a number of the world's largest financial institutions have, between them, received fines totalling billions of euros—the European Commission alone has so far imposed fines ...

What is the LIBOR rigging scandal? ›

Understanding the LIBOR Scandal

During the LIBOR Scandal, traders at many of these banks deliberately submitted artificially low or high interest rates in order to force the LIBOR higher or lower, in an effort to support their own institutions' derivative and trading activities.

What was the fine for the Libor scandal? ›

The United States Department of Justice charged three former employees, and ICAP paid $65 million to the US's Commodity Futures Trading Commission and £14 million ($22 million) to Britain's Financial Conduct Authority. In October 2013, Rabobank was fined €774 million by US, UK and Dutch regulators .

Why was LIBOR discontinued? ›

According to ICE, banks have been changing the way they transact business, and, as a result, Libor rate became a less reliable benchmark. SOFR is the main replacement for Libor in the United States. This benchmark is based on the rates U.S. financial institutions pay each other for overnight loans.

What was the aftermath of the Libor scandal? ›

The LIBOR scandal had significant legal consequences for the banks involved. Barclays was the first bank to settle with regulators in the United States and the United Kingdom, agreeing to pay $450 million in fines. UBS and Royal Bank of Scotland also reached settlements with regulators, agreeing to pay fines of $1.

Did anyone go to jail for LIBOR? ›

Tom Hayes: First City trader jailed over Libor interest rate rigging loses appeal against 2015 conviction. Hayes served more than five years in prison after he was handed one of the longest prison sentences for white-collar crime in UK history.

Who benefited from the Libor scandal? ›

By colluding to manipulate LIBOR, the banks' traders raked in a fortune by betting on assets influenced by the interest rate. David Enrich followed the story while he was working for The Wall Street Journal and got close to the central figure in the scandal — star derivatives trader Tom Hayes.

Who is hurt from the manipulation of LIBOR? ›

Depending on its direction, any given trading-based manipulation might have harmed or benefitted Barclays' counterparties, which range from other banks and financial institutions, to institutional investors, hedge funds, and state and local municipalities, among others.

What is the highest LIBOR rate ever? ›

Interbank Rate in the United States remained unchanged at 5.59 percent on Wednesday May 1. Interbank Rate in the United States averaged 3.58 percent from 1986 until 2024, reaching an all time high of 10.63 percent in March of 1989 and a record low of 0.11 percent in September of 2021.

Is LIBOR banned? ›

The US dollar LIBOR bank panel ended on the 30 June 2023. This was the last remaining LIBOR panel. The overnight and 12-month US dollar LIBOR settings have now permanently ceased.

Is SOFR better than LIBOR? ›

SOFR is a data-driven lending benchmark. It's more reliable than its predecessor LIBOR and eliminates any manipulation by banks and provides more transparency to borrowing costs. It may only be used for U.S. dollars.

What would replace LIBOR? ›

The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) is a benchmark interest rate for dollar-denominated derivatives and loans that replaced the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

What is the conspiracy of LIBOR? ›

Beyond the scandal

In 2012, an international investigation found that bankers at a number of major financial institutions were manipulating LIBOR – falsely inflating or deflating their rate quotations – to profit from trades.

Is the LIBOR going to end? ›

Replacing LIBOR

The publication for one-week and two-month U.S.-dollar LIBOR ceased at the end of 2021. The remaining tenors of U.S.-dollar LIBOR are scheduled to cease publication after June 30, 2023. The end of LIBOR has precipitated the need for an alternative benchmark rate.

Who controls LIBOR? ›

Libor is calculated by the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and published by Refinitiv. It is an index that measures the cost of funds to large global banks operating in London financial markets or with London-based counterparties.

What is the Barclays bank controversy? ›

The executives were cleared in February 2020. In February 2018, the Serious Fraud Office charged Barclays with "unlawful financial assistance" related to billions of pounds raised from the Qatar deal. On 8 June 2020, Barclays was also accused of deceit by a British businesswoman Amanda Staveley's firm PCP Capital.

What does the LIBOR Act do? ›

First, the LIBOR Act authorizes the Board to determine benchmark replacement conforming changes that, in its discretion, would address one or more issues affecting the implementation, administration, and calculation of the Board-selected benchmark replacement in LIBOR contracts.

Who are the main stakeholders affected by the Libor scandal? ›

The main stakeholders that are affected by the rate-rigging scandal are customers and investors. According to Fernando (2021), the customer who took out a loan during the increase of Libor to purchase something is paying more interest rate than they should be.

What organization was responsible for calculating the LIBOR rate before the scandal? ›

The British Bankers' Association launched LIBOR in 1986—initially with only three currencies—the dollar, the yen, and the pound sterling. LIBOR was established as a standardized benchmark for the pricing of floating-rate corporate loans.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Geoffrey Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 6712

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Geoffrey Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-03-23

Address: 74183 Thomas Course, Port Micheal, OK 55446-1529

Phone: +13408645881558

Job: Global Representative

Hobby: Sailing, Vehicle restoration, Rowing, Ghost hunting, Scrapbooking, Rugby, Board sports

Introduction: My name is Geoffrey Lueilwitz, I am a zealous, encouraging, sparkling, enchanting, graceful, faithful, nice person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.