Abstract
Using quantile regression, we evaluate the forecasting performance of futures prices in the soybean complex. The procedure provides a more complete picture of the distribution of forecasts than mainstream methods that only focus on central tendency measures. Forecast performance differs by location in the futures price distribution. Futures forecast perform well in the centre of the distribution. However, futures prices tend to over-forecast when futures prices are high and under-forecast when futures prices are low, suggesting that futures prices tend to under-estimate price reversion towards the centre of the distribution. Forecast errors are larger when futures prices are high. The findings are related to theories in the literature used to explain pricing bias, and their implications for market participants are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-199 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | European Review of Agricultural Economics |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2020 |
Keywords
- forecast
- futures markets
- quantile regression
- soybean
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Online availability
Library availability
Related links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Huang, J., Serra, T., & Garcia, P. (2020). Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(1), 178-199. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz009
Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex. / Huang, Joshua; Serra, Teresa; Garcia, Philip.
In: European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.02.2020, p. 178-199.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Huang, J, Serra, T & Garcia, P 2020, 'Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex', European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 178-199. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz009
Huang J, Serra T, Garcia P. Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2020 Feb 1;47(1):178-199. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbz009
Huang, Joshua ; Serra, Teresa ; Garcia, Philip. / Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex. In: European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2020 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 178-199.
@article{9239f216a6d14e91b6e2642f8829df75,
title = "Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex",
abstract = "Using quantile regression, we evaluate the forecasting performance of futures prices in the soybean complex. The procedure provides a more complete picture of the distribution of forecasts than mainstream methods that only focus on central tendency measures. Forecast performance differs by location in the futures price distribution. Futures forecast perform well in the centre of the distribution. However, futures prices tend to over-forecast when futures prices are high and under-forecast when futures prices are low, suggesting that futures prices tend to under-estimate price reversion towards the centre of the distribution. Forecast errors are larger when futures prices are high. The findings are related to theories in the literature used to explain pricing bias, and their implications for market participants are discussed.",
keywords = "forecast, futures markets, quantile regression, soybean",
author = "Joshua Huang and Teresa Serra and Philip Garcia",
note = "Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge economic support by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hatch under accession number ILLU-470-374 and the Office of Futures and Options Research (OFOR) at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. We also thank anonymous referees for helpful comments. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2019; all rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/erae/jbz009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "178--199",
journal = "European Review of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0165-1587",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Are futures prices good price forecasts? Underestimation of price reversion in the soybean complex
AU - Huang, Joshua
AU - Serra, Teresa
AU - Garcia, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:The authors gratefully acknowledge economic support by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hatch under accession number ILLU-470-374 and the Office of Futures and Options Research (OFOR) at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. We also thank anonymous referees for helpful comments.Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2019; all rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Using quantile regression, we evaluate the forecasting performance of futures prices in the soybean complex. The procedure provides a more complete picture of the distribution of forecasts than mainstream methods that only focus on central tendency measures. Forecast performance differs by location in the futures price distribution. Futures forecast perform well in the centre of the distribution. However, futures prices tend to over-forecast when futures prices are high and under-forecast when futures prices are low, suggesting that futures prices tend to under-estimate price reversion towards the centre of the distribution. Forecast errors are larger when futures prices are high. The findings are related to theories in the literature used to explain pricing bias, and their implications for market participants are discussed.
AB - Using quantile regression, we evaluate the forecasting performance of futures prices in the soybean complex. The procedure provides a more complete picture of the distribution of forecasts than mainstream methods that only focus on central tendency measures. Forecast performance differs by location in the futures price distribution. Futures forecast perform well in the centre of the distribution. However, futures prices tend to over-forecast when futures prices are high and under-forecast when futures prices are low, suggesting that futures prices tend to under-estimate price reversion towards the centre of the distribution. Forecast errors are larger when futures prices are high. The findings are related to theories in the literature used to explain pricing bias, and their implications for market participants are discussed.
KW - forecast
KW - futures markets
KW - quantile regression
KW - soybean
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084853773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084853773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/erae/jbz009
DO - 10.1093/erae/jbz009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084853773
SN - 0165-1587
VL - 47
SP - 178
EP - 199
JO - European Review of Agricultural Economics
JF - European Review of Agricultural Economics
IS - 1
ER -