It’s a question that’s absolutely critical when judging a closed-end fund: how safe is the dividend?
This is particularly crucial when you consider the huge yields the average CEF offers compared to their ETF cousins. For the 2,918 ETFs available to US investors, the average payout is 1.9%, partly because 735 of these funds pay nothing at all. But even without those, the average ETF yield is still a pathetic 2.5%.
CEFs? For the over 450 covered by my CEF Insider service, the average yield is 7.3%, and only nine yield less than 1%. In fact, over 85% of CEFs yield more than 4%, while just 9% of ETFs do!
How can CEFs pay so much?
Cynics will say it’s because CEFs sacrifice returns to goose payments. I’d respond by saying that over 100 CEFs have outperformed a comparable index fund. And even a CEF that matches its benchmark crushes ETFs, because it gives you a bigger slice of that return in cash.
So let’s dig into the three major ways CEFs pay out those huge dividends. Along the way, we’ll uncover six funds paying upwards of 7% and crushing benchmarks left and right. We’ll also unmask one dividend pauper you need to dodge—or sell now if you own it.
The High-Yield Route (and 3 Funds Paying 7.2%+)
The simplest way for a CEF to give us a big income stream is for it to buy investments paying big dividends themselves, then hand that cash over to us.
CEF managers’ favorite high-yield plays: municipal bonds, for the high, tax-advantaged payouts they provide. But these pros also tap other big income earners, like high-yield (sometimes called “junk”) bonds, corporate loans and real estate investment trusts (REITs).
Many of the pros who run these funds are skilled at tapping these high-yield plays for big dividends and big returns. For instance, the Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has paid a 7.7% dividend yield and crushed the S&P 500 over the last decade. The comparison is almost embarrassing!
The PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunities Fund (PTY) has done something similar with corporate bonds, while the Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund (FFC) did it with preferred stocks.
PTY yields 9.1%, and FFC pays 7.1%, showing yet again how a CEF can deliver massive returns and big yields at the same time.
The Gains-to-Income Route (and 3 More Dividends Up to 9.8%)
Going with high-yield investments isn’t the only way to bring home the dividend bacon. Thanks to a number of well-managed equity funds, CEF investors have enjoyed 7%+ yields and market-beating returns over the long haul.
These funds invest in a portfolio of stocks, maybe collecting some income along the way through dividends or options and other derivatives on those stocks. But management mainly rotates out of overbought stocks and into oversold ones.
This can work very well. For instance, the Gabelli Equity Trust (GAB) pays a whopping 9.6% while crushing the market, even though GAB invests in the same kinds of stocks you’ll find in the S&P 500.
The Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) have done much the same, even though their focuses have been very different (dividend-growth stocks for the former and tech stocks for the latter).
With 7.9% and 6.9% yields, these funds provide a generous income stream to go with their market-crushing returns. Cynics take note.
The Beggar-Thy-Investor Route (and a 10% Dividend That’s Teetering)
Let’s wrap up with the one type of high-yield CEF you want to stay well away from: those that prop up their dividend payments despite poor returns. Perhaps the clearest example is the Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund (ERC), an equity fund that has danger written all over it, starting with crummy long-term results.
As you can see, ERC’s return is far behind that of the S&P 500, and its returns got worse in late 2013, just when stocks were getting started. The fact that ERC failed to keep up shows a flaw with the fund’s management, strategies or both. But the real problem is the dividend.
You can see here that ERC’s income stream has fallen throughout the 2010s, in part because its net asset value (NAV, or the market value of its portfolio) kept shrinking.
What we see here is a consistent trend, from about 2013 on, of the fund’s NAV shriveling, with a particularly big dip in 2016 that ERC hasn’t come close to recovering from. Yet management raised the dividend in 2017, just as NAV was in free-fall.
This is a common ploy among CEF managers, and it’s one you need to run away from at top speed.
To keep up high payments, a CEF will start to take money out of its portfolio and hand that over to us as a dividend. Right now, ERC pays what looks like an attractive 10.1% yield, but that’s an illusion. Unless management can stop its NAV from falling (it’s now near its 10-year low), it will have to cut dividends, as it did in the early 2010s.
One final word: while you need to dodge funds like this, don’t let them dash your dream of high yields and big price gains, because, as we just saw, many CEFs give you both.
Disclosure: none
